Celebrating International Mountain Day: Walking on Country in 2025

Join Great Dividing Trail Association (GDTA) Walks to six iconic Mountains

United Nations International Mountain Day (IMD) is celebrated each year on 11 December. Its goal is to raise awareness about the role that mountains play in the lives of people and their importance to our planet. Barry Golding and Clive Willman made reference in their 2024 book, Six Peaks Speak (Chapter 9) to the serendipitous origins of Mountain Day in the US in Autumn 1838, the exact same time that peaks in the Central Highlands of Victoria were being unsettled.

In 2024, DJAARA, for the Traditional Owners generously invited the community to share their very successful IMD celebration, see https://djadjawurrung.com.au/projects/imd/ in the stunning and culturally significant volcanic crater at Lalkambuk / Mt Franklin.

In 2025, during the week leading up to IMD, the GDTA is organising six interpretive loop walks to the summits of six diverse and special mountains in Victoria’s Central Highlands, within three adjoining First Nations. Here are GDTA’s planned 2025 walk offerings celebrating IMD:

  • Sat 6 Dec: Mount Kooyora / Guyura (486m) including Melville Caves in Mt Kooyora State Park, near Dunolly, in central Dja Dja Wurrung Country. Stunning granite landscape. Leader: Barry Golding. 8 km. Medium.
  • Sun 7 Dec: Mount Buninyong / Bonan Youang (745m) in Mt Buninyong Scenic Reserve, south of Ballarat in Wadawurrung Country. Amazing volcanic craters, messmate forest & views. Leader: Tim Bach. 10 km. Medium.
  • Mon 8 DecMount Steiglitz / Kal Kal Karrah (637m) and the glacial deposits at nearby Pykes Creek. The seldom visited Mt Steiglitz Scenic Reserve north of Ballan in Wurundjeri Country accessed via private land. Overlooking extensive First Nations volcanic plains. Leader: Arie Baelde. 2 km. Steep but Easy.
  • Tues 9 Dec (dawn walk): Mt Beckworth / Nyaninuk (629m), within Mt Beckworth Scenic Reserve near Clunes in southern Dja Dja Wurrung Country. Diverse granite landscape. Leader: Barry Golding. 6 km. Medium.
  • Wed 10 Dec: Wombat Hill (670m), a town walk around historic Daylesford in Dja Dja Wurrung Country. The walk will start with a launch of the Lerderderg Track Walk or Ride Guide and conclude with a picnic in Wombat Hill Botanical Gardens. Leader: Tim Bach. 7 km. Medium.
  • Thurs 11 Dec (IMD) Blue Mountain / Wuid Krruirk (871m), little known mountain within the proposed Wombat – Lerderderg National Park south of Trentham: on the forested Great Divide, between Dja Dja Wurrung, Wadawurrung & Wurundjeri Country. Leader: Arie Baelde. 10 km. Medium.


Registration will be available for any of these IMD walks two weeks prior to each walk via https://www.gdt.org.au/events . Non-walking club members are welcome, but will bring $10 cash on the day to cover GDTA walker insurance.

Six Peaks Speak soft cover published


Revised 16 Oct 2025

Barry Golding and Clive Willman are delighted that our book, Six Peaks Speak: Unsettling Legacies in Southern Dja Dja Wurrung Country, published in Dec 2024 in hard cover, has recently been published in soft cover as well (Sept 2025). This not only makes our book more accessible (soft cover author price AUD$55), but allows us an opportunity to make a few small improvements, as well as adding some positive ‘reader feedback’ notes inside the front cover.


We are really pleased with the high quality of printing in both versions of our book. If you want to order author copies of either version at $55 soft cover; $89 hard cover, please email Barry Golding: b.golding@federation.edu.au (add $12 if required for postal delivery within Australia). NOTE: Paradise Books in Daylesford has both hard cover and soft cover books for sale at retail price [NOTE: ordering copies via the US-based publisher CGRN, including delivery to Australia, will cost $US61.50, approx.= AUD$93 for soft cover, US$86.50, = approx. AUD $131 hard cover).

Presentations about Six Peaks Speak


Since our book was launched, we have undertaken lots of local public talks: in Daylesford, Castlemaine, Bendigo, Maryborough, Maldon, Clunes, Kingston, Creswick, Trentham, Harcourt and Baynton. Here are some forthcoming options in 2025, if you or others are interested.


• Fri 7 Nov 7.30pm: Newham Landcare Group: Newham Mechanics Institute.
• Sat 22 Nov 2pm: Connecting Country AGM: Castlemaine.

Bill Gammage review of ‘Six Peaks Speak’

Six Peaks speak. Unsettling legacies in Southern Dja Dja Wurrung Country

Barry Golding with Clive Willman, Illinois USA, Common Ground Books, 2024, 402 pp.

Reviewed by Bill Gammage in Australian Journal of Adult Learning 65(1), April 2025

The Six Peaks of Barry Golding’s title are in southern Dja Dja Wurrung

country in central Victoria. In the order that Golding discusses them,

they are Mounts Kooroocheang/Gurutjanga, Beckworth/Nyaninuk,

Greenock/unknown, Tarrengower/Dharrang Gauwa, Alexander/

Liyanganuk, and Franklin/Lalkambuk. Each peak ‘speaks’ of its rocks

and soils, of Dja Dja Wurrung presence before and after invasion, and

of the impact of invader enterprise, exploitation, and mismanagement

on the land and its people. The peaks say little of other themes well

developed in this book: their plants and animals at the time Europeans

came, the murderous dispossession of the Dja Dja Wurrung, the political

and economic conflicts of settlement, and the question the authors

choose as central: “How can we help future generations deal with

legacies of what happened around these mountains?” (p.346, also p.10).126 Lei Xia

The mountains (Golding rarely writes “peaks”) parallel each other in

addressing these themes. First, for each mountain geology and soils

are described in detail unmatched in any previous local or regional

history, perhaps any history. The authors argue that geology is the rock

on which almost all else is built (for example pp.32-40, 198-9). Golding

has a geology degree, but some text possibly, many photos, and almost

all the beautifully drawn maps (worth printing on their own) are by

Clive Willman. His maps speak, though some text is too small, and the

captions are too faint. Where maps matter, it’s best to increase a book’s

page size to suit.

Though necessarily unevenly for want of sources, Golding next traces

what is known of Dja Dja Wurrung clans, each probably local to a

mountain and its surrounds. He sketches their caring management,

their feeling for Country and language, their shattered survival despite

rapid (p.248) and genocidal (p.316) slaughter by arriving Europeans,

especially on the grassy volcanic plains (p.57), and their continued

presence since despite endemic discrimination. European occupation

follows, a tale of public and private environmental use and misuse up to

the present. Golding concludes with how each mountain might be better

used and cared for, noting that each has a 2024 guide for visitors.

Golding tells his story via two key perceptions: “unsettling”, an

experience common to all the mountains and their surrounds, and

“legacies”, or relics of each mountain’s geology, circumstances and

history. These two perceptions shape Golding’s subtitle, which he uses

in striking ways to illustrate how the land and past influence the present

and future.

As Golding notes (p.23), “unsettling” is a word gaining traction among

historians. They take Aboriginal society on the eve of invasion as settled,

with land, people and animals balanced and flourishing. This world was

unsettled, upended, destroyed, when white “settlers” came, and it is still

unsettled, built on greed and ignorance and menaced by environmental

degradation in many forms. Golding does not overlook the ways in

which a minority of people have attempted—and continue to attempt—

to repair Dja Dja Wurrung land, but such respect is often overshadowed

by the pioneer urge to improve, develop, and exploit. His multi-faceted

account of unsettlers as aliens smacks more of the Goths sacking Rome

than of a civilisation in harmony with its surroundings.Book review 127

“Legacies” are not necessarily gifts or inheritances, but more often

consequences or vestiges. Many stem from the original or continuing

unsettling of individuals or communities. The flavour of Golding’s

treatment of them is seen in his comment on pioneer squatter John

Hepburn, who “remains locally celebrated, while the mountain

[Kooroocheang/Gurutjanga], the gorges, the creeks, the waterfall, every

oven mound and the ceremonial earth rings are virtually unknown. All

are out of bounds on private land. I contend that this area… [is] a unique

cultural landscape and an outstanding part of our national heritage”

(p.88, also p.210).

Other legacies tell of the Dja Dja Wurrung persistence in the face of

uncaring or unthinking newcomers, the visible remnants of European

pastoralism, mining and building, and little-known examples of the

numerous small to medium scale activities of a new society. The book

selects ceremonial rings, oven mounds/middens, quarries, mill floors,

mine workings and machinery, Aboriginal Protectorate sites, Farmers’

Commons, springs, cairns, memorials, graves, tree plantings and

clearings, places of too much activity and too little, snapshots of failure

and success past and present.

Golding says his book “might be categorised as an environmental and

cultural history. However,…” (p.379). The category is closest to his

content, but that “However” matters. This is a history unlike any I have

read, regional in focus but universal in argument and I hope readership.

It ranges from deep geological time to calls for future repair and

restoration. It argues for Dja Dja Wurrung expertise to be recognised,

and for Aboriginal people everywhere to be given a fair go. It adds depth

and detail to what informed locals know, is crowded with instances of

past injustices and misuse, and is firm for better management of the

land. Especially in a concluding chapter, it urges a need to reconnect

“Peaks, People and Place”, there and everywhere. Histories are rarely so

overtly crusading.

No one else could write this book. It needed locals to spend decades

tramping or cycling the land, seeing and questioning as Golding and

Willman have. It needed too a nose for paper sources scattered and

hidden. The authors found good information in the most unlikely places,

much of it not seen since contemporaries bound it with that familiar

red tape. From both fieldwork and paper (p.379), things great and small128 Lei Xia

speak. This book is solid going, but well written with few typos, and

bubbling with insights and remedies. Golding and Willman enlighten

not only where they live, but where you live too

Six Peaks Speak Book published!

Six Peaks Speak: Unsettling Legacies in Southern Dja Dja Wurrung Country

Barry Golding with Clive Willman

New Book Published, November 2024

Publication details at:

https://cgscholar.com/bookstore/works/six-peaks-speak

Summary

  • A compelling storytelling journey in southern Dja Dja Wurrung Country through the eyes of six iconic mountains in central Victoria, Australia.
  • The featured mountains are today called Mt Kooroocheang [near Smeaton], Mt Beckworth [near Clunes], Mt Greenock [near Talbot], Mt Tarrengower [near Maldon], Mt Alexander [near Castlemaine] and Mt Franklin [near Daylesford].
  • An interdisciplinary and intercultural story across time, cultures, contested histories and unsettled relationships, uniquely traversing First Nations and unsettler, history, geology, ecology, anthropology and reserve management.

Hardback book of 432 pages, with 98 full colour images, including 26 maps (15 new maps created by Clive Willman, and 11 historic maps), 60 contemporary photographs, 11 historic photographs and six line drawings by local artist, Belinda Prest. 

  • Researched by Professor Barry Golding AM during 2023 as a State Library Victoria (SLV) Creative Regional Fellow. Meticulously referenced with over 1,100 footnotes.
  • Fresh, new insights into Deep Time with significant contributions to the text and to the geological history, including maps and images contributed by Clive Willman as supporting author.
  • Assistance from Uncle Ricky Nelson, Harley Dunolly-Lee, & Rodney Carter for the Dja Dja Wurrung traditional owners (DJAARA), with research access to the Victorian Aboriginal Heritage Register via a Cultural Heritage Permit.
  • Incorporating new information from Crown Reserve files, SLV, Public Records Office Victoria, local museum libraries and over 70 local and expert informants.
  • Aside from a comprehensive introductory chapter and conclusion, the book includes one chapter about each of the six mountains.

Both authors live on southern Dja Dja Wurrung Country. 

  • Barry Golding AM is an Honorary Professor of Federation University in Ballarat, and lives in Kingston [near Creswick].
  • Clive Willman is a geologist based in Castlemaine.

Published by Common Ground Research Networks (CGRN) in Champaign, Illinois, US, printed in Melbourne, Australia

  • Available as a hard cover book or as a pdf.
  • Hard cover version available now from Barry Golding for AUD$79; add $10 for postage within Australia  (order via b.golding@federation.edu.au ).
  • Purchase in store (RRP approx. AUD$99) at: Stoneman’s Bookroom (Castlemaine), Paradise Bookshop & Tourist Information Centre (Daylesford). BOOM Clunes, Collins on Lydiard (Ballarat) or order online, including via Readings, Carlton.
  • Best online purchase option in Australia via Booktopia.
  • Available for order online now via CGRN bookshop: https://cgscholar.com/bookstore/works/six-peaks-speak (US$75 for hard cover book: total delivered approx. AUD$125; also available as pdf US$25, approx. AUD$38)

Reviews

‘This is a captivating journey, highly timely in national discourse and knowledge gap-filling, in that it brings together lenses rarely seen before. We can benefit from the many vantages and vistas in this book. It reminds us of the importance of place and a desired future where we respect Country and respect one another in it.’ Professor Tony Dreise, Pro Vice-Chancellor, Indigenous Engagement, Charles Sturt University & Gamilaraay First Nations person.

‘The deep and painstaking research undertaken to bring this book together is significant and impressive. The narrative style, interweaving history of the locations with geology make this book unique, quite beautiful and accessible to a broader audience. It involves a discussion about deeply unsettling legacies, highly relevant today in Australia. It is indeed powerful and disquieting at the same time.’ Professor Annette Foley, Professor of Vocational and Adult Education, Federation University

‘Professor Golding presents a cultural and environmental history of landscape in central Victoria, Australia. His vision is for a reconciled relationship on Country. He extends First Nations people respect that has been missing until recently in Australian historiography, providing an important model of how non-Indigenous Australians should engage with traditional owners in research and writing projects.’ Dr Stephen Carey, Senior Research Fellow, Federation University

‘Barry Golding speaks with care and an enduring need for us all to be at our own peaks, not just the hills in this book, their geology, flora and fauna. … Thank you for choosing these Six Peaks that are special to me also, and for being their friend, for they could not ask for anyone better. Dhelkup Murrupuk, we give you good spirit.’ (in book’s preface) Rodney Carter, Dja Dja Wurrung Group Chief Executive Officer

‘Golding and Willman’s thought-provoking book furthers our understandings of land and landscape. The complex legacies, uncomfortable truths, shared heritage and lessons for land management in the present day are explored in this book. In it peak specific stories of the Southern Dja Dja Wurrung Country are revealed in conjunction with a deeply personal and immersive response to this historically and geologically significant region.’ Professor Keir Reeves, Director for the Collaborative Research Centre in Australian History, Federation University Australia

Men’s Sheds in Japan

Men’ Sheds in Japan

8 November 2023

Professor Barry Golding, with generous contributions and assistance from Dr Ayahito Ito (University of Tohoku: ayahito.ito@gmail.com) and Dr Risa Takashima (University of Hokkaido: risa-t@hs.hokudai.ac.jp), Japan

Preamble

Barry Golding visited Sapporo in Japan in early November 2024 to meet with researchers and shedders involved in one of only two ‘pilot’ Men’s Sheds then open in Japan. Barry is grateful to the men of the Pokke Kotan Men’s Shed in Sapporo and its key facilitators and researchers, Dr Ayahito Ito (affiliated with Tohoku University) and Dr Risa Takashima (from University of Hokkaido), Japan for sharing the information, which he has used as a basis for this English summary. Barry gratefully acknowledges support from the JST-RISTEX project for helping facilitate this visit and making several presentations to shedders, researchers and other stakeholders.

My Intention

I am sharing this information more widely via this blog, as many shedders around the world are very interested in what shedders and their supportive stakeholders are attempting. I have made them aware that other Men’s Sheds and shedders around the world are there to support and inform them on request.

I am convinced, from what I have seen and heard, of the considerable potential of Men’s Sheds, to address the needs of some older Japanese men. While grassroots Men’s Sheds on the Australian model have worked well and become active social movements in eight mostly English speaking, ‘Western’ nations, this is the first time Men’s Sheds have been seriously attempted in an Asian nation, Japan.

What follows is my brief summary of where Men’s Sheds are at in Japan as of November 2024. In summary, one Shed which I have visited is open in suburban Sapporo, in Hokkaido in far northern Japan. A separate but related Shed is open in Kyushu in far southern Japan, approximately 3 hours and 15 minutes flight time away. My information about this second Shed is limited to what I have been able to determine from a distance, limited by my non-existent Japanese language skills and limited English language skills of the main contact, Takashi Matsuo (Assistant Professor, Kumamoto Health Science University). 

My message to all of these pilot projects, based on national shedder experience elsewhere, is to communicate and collaborate ‘Shoulder to Shoulder’ like the shedders themselves, rather than working separately or competing. I anticipate that the ‘Japan Community Shed Association’ will progressively take on some of these national coordination roles, with direct shedder and stakeholder representation.

Achieving a successful cultural translation of the Australian Men’s Shed model beyond the pilot phase will likely require cultural adaptation. What is learnt through experience and well as from research and evaluation from these pilot projects (about what works and what does not work) will be very important.

‘The Men’s Shed in Hokkaido’ and ‘The ‘Men’s Shed in Kyushu’ in Kyushu, summarised in what follows, are part of the same JST-RISTEX project. The project originated in October 2022 when a Men’s Shed initiative titled ‘Citizen Support Project for Preventing Social Isolation and Loneliness’ started with the support of funding from Japan Science and Technology Agency Research Institute of Science and Technology for Society (JST-RISTEX) (FY2022-2026).

The primary purpose of this project is to establish Men’s Sheds in Japan and evaluate the effect of the Men’s Shed intervention from the perspective of qualitative and quantitative research. There are two active Men’s Sheds now open to November 2024, being developed and researched in parallel via this RISTEX initiative, in Hokkaido (northern Japan) and Kyushu(southern Japan).

The Men’s Shed in Hokkaido

Following an initial meeting in November 2022, the RISTEX proponents including Dr Ayahito Ito began to move forward to establish a Men’s Shed in Mizukami-village, Kumamoto prefecture and Sapporo city, Hokkaido prefecture.

In April 2023, Dr Risa Takashima, a researcher specialising in occupational therapy, along with their graduate student and a retired eldercare professional, began looking for men interested in helping establish the Sapporo Men’s Shed. 

Dr Takashi Matsuo (Kumamoto Health Science University) and Dr Risa Takashima started joint interview and participant observation with the aim of  seeking core members of the Shed, in the Kumamoto area of Kyushu, and in suburban Sapporo, Hokkaido respectively.

In April 2024, the Sapporo Men’s Shed, now officially named “Pokke Kotan,” was formally launched with 41 members aged between 50 and 84. Pokke Kotan is a First Nations Ainu[1] term that means “warm village”, reflecting a commitment to create a welcoming community for shedders.

In June 2023, preparations began to establish the Sapporo Men’s Shed with six founding members. By July, one more member joined, bringing the total number of founders to seven. In July 2024, a local construction company generously provided a former vacant house that they had used as a storage space. 

Over the following months, shedders worked together to clean and repair the space, see above, preparing it for use as a Shed.

Until March 2024, the research team continued qualitative field research and identified a future leader of the Shed. Since then, core members have coalesced around him. A local company generously provided with a former vacant house that they had used as a business office.

In November 2024, together with the local residents and other community stakeholders, an open house event was conducted to introduce “Pokke Kotan” as a dedicated space for men in the community. Here is the sign outside the Shed in Japanese with Dr Risa Takashima (left) and Dr Ayahito Ito (right). Translated from Japanese, the main part of the sign says Pokke Kotan Men’s Shed[2]. Note the inclusion in the sign of the four primary colours of the United Nation Millennium Development Goals.

Below is a photo taken during Barry Golding’s presentation, Men’s Sheds: Australia’s Gift to the World in the Pokke Kotan Men’s Shed on 2 November 2024, ably assisted by an interpreter (seated partly obscured at left).

The evening after my presentation many of the men involved from the Men’s Shed welcomed me to a dinner they had organised in a local community centre. Here is a photo of the men (Taken by Dr Ito, including myself(seated centre), Dr Risa Takashima (blue jacket, towards the left) and Dr Takashima’s PhD student, Rita Hirayama (striped top seated at far left). Everyone deliberately adopted a ‘Shoulder to Shoulder’ pose with crossed arms.

NOTE: The Shed has a website in Japanese, though it would not open safely when the link provided was tested, so it is not included here.

The Men’s Shed In Kyushu

On 30 November 2023 another Shed started in the small village of Mizukami, in Kumamoto prefecture in Kyushu, southern Japan. It is called Men’s Shed “Yo-Ro-Ya”(寄郎屋). The name loosely translates into English as “Let’s get together”(寄ろう) and “Men’s Shed”(屋.)

The first activity of the shedders was cleaning and renovating the space, preparing it for use as a Shed. Simultaneously, they started making advertising displays made of wood with chainsaws and bamboo charcoal (see below).

On 1 February 2024, the Yo-Ro-Ya shedders and stakeholders were interviewed by the Cabinet Secretariat’s Office for Isolation and Loneliness. Ms Yamamoto, head of the office, said: ‘Not much time has passed since the start of the Shed, but things are starting to go well. There are positive side effects, such as women and children showing up. So it has the potential to become a hub for people-to-people links.’

As a quick update, in November Assistant Professor Takashi Matsuo noted that ‘the men from our Shed began selling bamboo charcoal in October 2024. Our group has grown to fifteen members this year a notable number for our village of 2,000 people.’ Dr Matsuo hopes to build on they success and help create another Shed within the Kumamoto prefecture.

Yo-Ro-Ya has no website but they update their activities on Instagram in Japanese (see account @yorouya2023 on Instagram).

The main (Japanese speaking) contact for this Men’s Shed in Kyushu is Assistant Professor Takashi Matsou (matsuo-ta@kumamoto-hsu.ac.jp).

Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology (TMIG) and its plans for Men’s Sheds

The Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology (TMIG: located approximately midway between these RISTEX initiated Sheds, in the Japanese capital city, Tokyo) has plans to develop pilot Men’s Sheds in Tokyo in the future, and has separately applied for funding for implementation and research related to men’s social participation. The main contacts for this parallel TMIG initiative (who can respond in English, and whom I visited and presented to in Tokyo in 2023) are Dr Kumiko Nonaka (knonaka60@gmail.com) and Professor Hiroshi Murayama (hmurayama_tky@yahoo.co.jp).


[1] The Ainu are an Indigenous (First Nations) people who primarily inhabit the island of Hokkaido in Japan, but also live in the north of Honshu, Japan’s main island, and Sakhalin Island in Russia. There are more than 24,000 Ainu in Japan.

[2] About the ‘871’: The house was given by Hanai-gumi, a construction company. Japanese read 871 as ‘Hanai’. A part of Hachi (8)-Nana (7)-Ichi (1), that is Ha-Na-I; the number 350 is the house’s address.

Women’s Sheds Internationally to 2024

Michelle Slater, Establishment Chair, Women’s Sheds Australia awsacommittee@gmail.com with Professor Barry Golding as a Women’s Sheds Australia Interim Ambassador

Published 4 October 2024

Women’s Sheds have slowly emerged as a separate and sometimes parallel movement to Men’s Sheds in several countries with Men”s Sheds since 2010.

Professor Barry Golding (from Australia) and Dr Lucia Carragher (from Ireland) created an early online data base of Women’s Sheds internationally https://barrygoanna.com/2020/07/13/womens-sheds/ as a means of connecting and supporting the emerging movement during the movement’s early years to May 2024. With national peak body Women’s Shed organisations coalescing in Australia, Ireland and the UK during 2024, we anticipate this data base be maintained in the future by these emerging national organisations.

Barry Golding and Lucia Carragher summarised the history and development of ‘Women’s Sheds Worldwide’ to 2021 in Chapter 10 of Shoulder to Shoulder: Broadening the Men’s Shed Movement, Common Ground Research Networks, Illinois, pages 319-353: bookvailable for purchase via https://cgscholar.com/bookstore/works/shoulder-to-shoulder ]. They identified 124 Women’s Sheds had opened worldwide to 2021, around one half of which were in Australia, with most of the balance in Ireland or the UK and three in New Zealand.

Barry and Lucia, with Professor Annette Foley published the first peer reviewed journal article about Women’s Sheds in July 2021 called ‘The Women’s Shed movement: Scoping the field internationally’ [Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 61(2 ), pp. 150-174, accessible via http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/HandleResolver/1959.17/180068] Our article includes a proposed typology involving a continuum between men-only Sheds and women-only Sheds with many other possible combinations of Shed names, participants and locations.

What follows is a light edited summary contributed by Michelle Slater as Establishment Chair, Women’s Sheds Australia about how the Women’s Shed movement is travelling in Australia and internationally to late 2024 which complements these 2021 accounts.

Women’s Sheds in Australia

Michelle Slater
Women’s Sheds Australia is compiling a growing list of Women’s Sheds, with more than 50 known, active Women’s Sheds across Australia to October 2024. The challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic led to the closure of a little over 20 previously established Women’s Sheds, reflecting the pressures faced during that period.

Diversity in program delivery
Many Women’s Sheds focus on activities around crafting and tool-based work, but there is a broad range of diversity in programs being delivered. Some Women’s Sheds, like the Bayswater Women’s Hub in Western Australia have partnered with local domestic violence refuges to offer tool skills workshops for women starting over after domestic violence incidents. These programs provide vital skills and a pathway to reconnect with the community, fostering both personal and social recovery.

Gender-exclusive spaces in Women’s Sheds offer psychological safety to family and domestic violence (FDV) survivors and a potential connection option for those in coercive control relationships. Other Women’s Sheds, like the Playford Women’s Shed in South Australia offer hot meals to those in need in their community, offering a much-needed stop-gap in local services for those falling through the cracks. There are several Women’s Sheds centred in communities with high Indigenous populations, such as Oodnadatta Women’s Shed in South Australia and Urapuntja Women’s Shed in the Northern Territory, with a focus on art, painting, bush medicine and education workshops. The Gap She Shed in Queensland has a number of social and health-focussed activities, such as a walking group, mahjong and a book club.

Resource Accessibility
Recognising that women generally have less access to tools compared to men, some Women’s Sheds have initiated either formal or informal Tool Libraries. These libraries enhance resource accessibility and encourage participation in DIY and maintenance activities.

Often Women’s Sheds struggle to keep up with membership demand, particularly as many have limited access to facilities, given the most common model is being co-located with Men’s Sheds. Skilled Women’s Shed volunteers are in exceptionally high demand as a high volume of members seek to learn ‘Shed skills’.

Funding Challenges
Unlike many Men’s Sheds, which benefit from being eligible to apply for funding from either the National Shed Development Programme and some state-based Men’s Shed funding support programs, Women’s Sheds in Australia face significant challenges in securing funding and facilities. Funding opportunities are not as readily available, are applied for individually and are time consuming for volunteers to coordinate.

Recent funding opportunities, such as the Government of Western Australia’s Women’s Grants for a Stronger Future Program, highlights the growing recognition of issues facing women in society, such as safety, health, leadership, and economic independence. Women’s Sheds are well positioned to play a crucial role in addressing these issues

International Presence

Global Network
Women’s Sheds exist in Ireland, New Zealand, Canada, and the UK. These sheds are adapting to their local contexts while embracing the core principles of community support and skill sharing. Ireland recently reported it has over 40 Women’s Sheds, holding an inaugural National Forum of Women’s Sheds. A movement in Ireland is emerging to establish a formal Irish Women’s Shed body.

Evolving Dynamics
There is a growing trend among many Men’s Sheds to open their doors to women, typically through combined sessions or on days when their facilities are not otherwise in use. Additionally, more Community Sheds that are non-gendered and open to all are emerging, reflecting a shift towards more gender-inclusive community spaces. Trans and non-binary folks are feeling more comfortable joining Sheds, and Shed memberships are evolving along with societal trends to ensure all people feel welcomed in these spaces. However more work is required in this area to ensure consistency of experience.

Men’s Sheds Internationally

Updated 2 October 2024

Professor Barry Golding AM, Patron, Australian Men’s Shed Association b.golding@federation.edu.au

Prepared for AMSA’s 10th Conference, Murray Bridge, South Australia, 4-5 Sept 2024

It is three years since my 433 page book, Shoulder to shoulder: Broadening the Men’s Shed Movement’ was published. This 2021 book and my previous 426 page (2015) book, The Men’s Shed Movement: The Company of Men, provided definitive histories of the development of Men’s Shed movements around the world. These books are still available for purchase, as below, via the US-based Common Ground Research Networks website (US$50 for a book, postage is extra; US $25 for a pdf version).

It is timely, as The Australian Men’s Shed Association (AMSA) holds its 10th biennial national Conference, to summarise where things are internationally at in September 2024. Remember that the first Shed in a community setting specifically for men was opened 31 years ago in Goolwa, South Australia, and that the first Men’s Shed by that name opened only 26 years ago in Tongala, Victoria.

What follows are lightly edited summaries of information generously provided by representatives of eight Men’s Shed associations around the world. Information was sought and provided by: AMSA in Australia, the UKMSA in the United Kingdom, SMSA in Scotland, MENZSHED NZ (New Zealand), IMSA in Ireland, USMSA in the United States, Men’s Sheds Canada, and Maends Modesteder in Denmark.

Aside from Denmark, to 2024 most Men’s Shed (and Women’s Shed) development has occurred in these primarily Anglophone nations. It is pertinent to note here that several pilot Sheds are in the process of opening in Japan in 2024, driven by an acknowledgment that loneliness and isolation and their adverse impact on health and wellbeing, particularly in later life, are worldwide issues. Several other African, European and Asian nations have showed interest in and set up small numbers of Men’s Sheds including in Kenya, Iceland and France.

Beneath each national snapshot are some notes about the number of Sheds in each country over the years. On the final page a graph plots the data available to 1 September 2024. In total, there are at least 3,300 Men’s Sheds open to globally in these main shedding nations to September 2024. With Women’s Sheds added, the total number of Shed-based organisations open globally is likely to be at least 3,500.

I have added some notes about Shed numbers* after each national summary. Given recent developments broadening the reach of Sheds inclusive of Women’s Sheds around the world since 2021, I have teamed up with Michelle Slater, Establishment Chair, Australian Women’s Shed Association to publish as a separate blog about Women’s Sheds internationally to 2024, see https://barrygoanna.com/2024/10/04/womens-sheds-in-australia-internationally-2024-update/

MENZSHED NZ  (NEW ZEALAND) https://menzshed.org.nz/

Thanks to to National Secretary MENZSHED NZ, Roger Bowman assisted by MENZSHED NZ Chair, David Broadhead chairman@menzshed.nz . [David also attended the AMSA 2024 Conference in Murray Bridge].

MENZSHED NZ has 135 member sheds. There are an estimated 20 sheds that may join as they become more established, or that have chosen not to join. And another 20 initiatives that didn’t proceed, either through not attracting interest or challenges obtaining a site. These challenges include funding and unwillingness of councils to support establishment of a Shed.

Sheddie members total about 5,700 which includes about 6% women. Some sheds offer mixed membership, others are men only. Sheds seem to have coped well during the COVID 19 pandemic years, complying with lockdown periods. They made their own decisions about attendance by unvaccinated sheddies, fortunately those days are a fast fading memory. Several sheds are responsive to wider community needs, including:

  • a shed that runs a weekly morning program for men with intellectual disabilities
  • manufacturing rodent traps for conservation groups
  • hosting young people at the shed e.g. cubs for annual Pinewood Derby
  • picnic tables for reserves .

Legislation: Sheds are most commonly either an Incorporated Society (70%) or a Charitable Trust (30%). The Incorporated Societies Act 2022 requires societies to re-register by April 2026 or face deregistration. Resources to help are available at the Societies Office – it’s not an onerous challenge. The option to establish as a Charitable Trust is no longer available. It was a popular choice for Sheds with very small memberships – having less than the minimum members required to register as a society.

Challenges: facing the national body include:

  • Funding. Sheds pay a per shed levy of NZ$25 that hasn’t changed since inception. As the regional representatives transitioned to travel reimbursements equal to Government taxation allowances, we need to look at alternative funding activity. A proposal to move to a capitation fee model (a rate per sheddie, say NZ$3- $5) was not well received by Sheds.
  • We are now looking at how best to approach the central government to support us, along similar lines to Australia.

Officers: A large segment of the South Island has been without regional representation for three years. The role was carried by a former Chairman until his retirement this year. Next year the Treasurer, Secretary and two Regional Reps are not seeking reelection after periods of a decade of service.

Engagement: Sheds are always very welcoming of a visit by any of the national team. But can be unresponsive to reminders about paying subs, advising changes of officers, providing newsletter content – the administrative activity is often left to the willing few.

Men’s Health: While the value of the social aspects of blokes getting together at the shed should not be underestimated, there isn’t regular evidence of health initiatives undertaken at Sheds.  Some sheds (e.g. Masterton Men’s Shed) do very well.  

NOTICE: New Zealand National Conference 4-6 April 2025 hosted by the Invercargill Men’s Shed.

Activities include: Niagara Sawmill; Fi Glass Innovations; 3D printing; Vintage machinery; Guest speakers: Health, Financial Planning, Work & Income NZ re seniors, David Helmers AMSA. Corporates – Carbatec; Saturday Dinner at HWR Transport World Sunday MENZSHED NZ AGM; Ladies program – Seriously Good Chocolate, lunch at Fosters Gardens, afternoon entertainment.

*There were 54 Sheds open in New Zealand in 2015; this figure grew to 121 by 2021, a growth rate of 124% across six years; the growth rate in the 3 years between 2021 and 2024 is 12% (see Golding, 2021, p.223).

United Kingdom Men’s Sheds Association (UKMSA) https://menssheds.org.uk/

Thanks to UK Men’s Sheds Association CEO, Charlie Bethel charlie.bethel@ukmsa.org.uk

Sheds are growing with over 1,180* across the UK with some great work taking place in all corners of the country and there is certainly a need for many more with virtually every Shed we visit being at capacity. In response we are working harder than ever to support growth, Shed vitality and championing Sheds and the Shed Movement.

There has been great progress with a Shed in the UK Parliament for a week in March 2024 and UKMSA representation with government supporting a health strategy for men and we hope to grow our influence further as we are now in our second decade. ‘Men’s Sheds Cymru’ is now part of the UKMSA framework and Wales is going from strength to strength. The UK ShedFest had over 500 visitors this year with visitors from across the UK and Canadian Men’s Sheds thanks to a partnership with a joint funder.  A new partnership with Diageo will be complementing our growing toolkits to support the health of Shedders.

Sheds across the UK are generally happy, resilient to increased costs in services such as water, electricity, etc. and are very supportive of the development of more Sheds. At the same time, the model of Sheds being delivered to people by external organisations, a model UKMSA has never supported, is struggling and we are spending more time helping some of these work in a different way.

*There were 127 Sheds open across the UK in 2015; this figure grew to 810 by 2021, a growth rate of 538% across six years; the growth rate in the 3 years between 2021 and 2024 is 31%. [See Golding, 2021, p.119]

United States Men’s Sheds Association (USMSA) https://usmenssheds.org/

Thanks to Mark Winston, Chair, US Men’s Sheds Association mark@usmenssheds.org

The US Men’s Sheds Association has been developing sheds that combat the cycle of social isolation and loneliness in all people since 2017. We are honored to contribute these words as part of your 10th national conference in Australia in 2024. 

We continue our work every day, and I am pleased to say we have some of the most committed, hardworking people on USMSA Board. Their effort and work are amazing. 

We do not have the resources many organizations have, which are funded by their federal governments and other well-meaning organizations. 

What we have is very valuable: the human component, people who genuinely care for their fellow man and woman. Although we are pretty much self-funded, we have accumulated a little over 30 sheds so far in the US. We did lose a few during COVID.

We hold national conferences and speak to everyone who wishes to know more about the Shed movement, as well as consult with new shed leaders. We have started a monthly shedders conference, which everyone is invited to. A great deal of valuable information gets passed along, and we have some wonderful guest speakers.

With the momentum we’ve built, we are hopeful that next year, we will receive national recognition. This will not only validate our efforts but also support the growth of more Sheds, transforming more lives, families, and communities. 

We have all experienced the Shed movement changing people’s lives in the US and abroad. This work is very important for the entire world. As we say in the US, the Men’s Shed movement is a bright spot in an ever-darkening world. We are stronger together

*There we no Men’s Sheds open in the US in 2015; by mid-2021 there were 17 (Golding, 2021, p,247). The growth rate over approximately three years to September 2024 is 68 per cent.

Men’s Sheds Canada https://www.mensshedscanada.ca/

Thanks to Dr Robert Goluch robert.g@mensshedscanada.org , President, Men’s Sheds Canada

We are doing well, moving forward and gaining strength as a national organization. Men’s Sheds Canada (MSC) is evolving cautiously and progressively. We have recently held our 3rd Annual General Meeting. We now have about 135 Sheds across Canada. We have established four Provincial Associations (British Columbia, Alberta, Ontario, Manitoba). MSC has launched an Ambassador program to start new Sheds.

We secured five year funding from Waltons Trust (a Canadian philanthropic committed one of whose three aims is to ‘reduce loneliness and social isolation among older adults so they live happier and healthier lives’). These funds are used in support of MSC’s infrastructure, provincial Associations and Sheds by way of grants (Start-Up @ $1K, Capacity Building @ CAD$10K, and Community Connections @ CASD$10K). This funding enabled MSC to hire an Executive Director, Manager of Operations, Fund Development Consultant, Communications Consultant and IT support, on either a full-time or contracted basis. MSC is working to transition from a working board to a governing board.

MSC established a Research Committee that is served by several distinguished gerontologists involving six universities. We are working on creating a data repository on Canadian Men’s Sheds with University of Toronto. MSC representatives attended UKMSA’s ‘Shedfest’ and visited Ireland to learn about its Men’s Shed movement. Good luck with AMSA’s 10th national Shed conference in Australia.

There were 28 Men’s Sheds in Canada in late 2020 (Golding, 2021, p.274). The growth rate in Canada in the four years to September 2024 is an astonishing 417 per cent.

Irish Men’s Sheds Association (IMSA) https://menssheds.ie/

Information from Enda Egan, CEO IMSA, enda@menssheds.ie

The Irish Men’s Sheds Association currently has 435 registered sheds in the 26 counties from the South of Ireland and 65 sheds registered from the six counties in the North of Ireland. In total there are just over 500 Sheds on the island of Ireland. The IMSA organisation with a team of eight staff continues to Support sheds on the Island of Ireland with 7,500 men attending Sheds on a weekly basis. 

  1. This year 250K Euro additional funding from government which supported the recruitment of an “Information Officer and set up of a new Shed Helpline number “ /National Conference and 30 Networks.
  2. The IMSA is currently in the process of writing a new strategic plan for 2025 to 2030.
  3. The Sheds for Life programme which targets reach 300 men + participating in a Health & Well Being programme annually.
  4. The Volunteer support programme which recruits and trains 26 / 30 IMSA Volunteers per annum to support Sheds on the ground in their county. 
  5. 30 Networks per annum to bring Sheds together in their county to support them with Governance, Grant applications and Health and safety in their sheds etc.,
  6. The IMSA Annual Conference with attendance of 200 Shed members and streamed live into Sheds around the country to support over 2,000 men taking part from their Sheds.
  7. There are many separate initiatives which can be view via YouTube: see links below.

Further info and resources:

*An IMSA press release suggests that 450 Men’s Sheds were open in Ireland in June 2024. In 2021 my best estimate to September 2020 (six months into the COVID pandemic which impacted very severely on Irish Sheds) was 460 Sheds open (Golding, 2021, p.122). This represents a very small (2%) decrease in the number of Irish Sheds over the four years between 2020 and 2024.

Scottish Men’s Sheds Association (SMSA) https://scottishmsa.org.uk/

Input from Jason Schroeder, ceo@scottishmsa.org.uk  CEO SMSA

The Scottish Men’s Sheds Movement continues to grow and thrive. However there is certainly room for many more Sheds, especially in our rural and deprived areas to combat social isolation and loneliness. There are now 204 Sheds (139 open and 65 developing) across Scotland – a devolved country in its own right – in all 32 local authority regions: 18 new Shed groups were supported during this stage by the SMSA Development Team over the last 12 months.

Following the pandemic, Shed visits began again in force to improve localised support for the Movement and our development team (consisting of two part-time Development Officers, one long-standing member of staff now covering the East Coast and another new member of staff to cover the West Coast). They have visited 76 Sheds in the last 12 months to deliver face-to-face support. Twenty six  Men’s Shed groups were also supported by SMSA Trustees, our regional ambassadors, through face-to-face visits. Our popular and comprehensive magazine, The Scottish Shedder, has over 3,500 subscribers that receive the 30+ page publication every second month to keep them updated with all things Sheds with excellent feedback.

The SMSA, which is not affiliated to any other UK Men’s Sheds Associations and works exclusively in Scotland as a registered Scottish charity. It now has 4,088 individual members, making us the largest men’s health and wellbeing charity in Scotland. From this membership, 3% are aged between 18 and 30, 31% aged 31 to 59 and 66% aged 60+. The proportion in the 31-39 year bracket is on the increase following continuous promotion of the 18+ model and breaking down barriers, emphasising that Men’s Sheds are just for the retired. As per the SMSA Manifesto, our charity also aims to improve our reach to the Armed Forces and Veterans community and Blue Light services. Around one quarter (23%) are Veterans or from Blue Light [emergency] Services.

Over the last year, the SMSA team has facilitated and/or attended 22 regional Shed Network meetings across ten regions with 76 Scottish Sheds represented and 352 Shed trustee/member representatives in attendance. The SMSA’s top ten support requests from open Sheds include: energy costs; premises and community asset transfer; social prescribing; succession planning; funding; safe working including Shed supervision, machine competence and First Aid; women in Sheds; tool donation; visits to other Sheds (Learning Exchange programme); and attracting new and younger members. The SMSA’s top ten support requests from developing Sheds include: starting up a Shed; governance—constitution/charitable status; setting up a bank account; SMSA membership benefits; invites for SMSA to organise and present at public meetings; development/business plan; role of office bearers; insurance; Shed visits and Scottish Community Alliance Learning Exchange; and premises including private and public renting ownership and buildings options.

The uncertainty of the future of our national support hub and the Movement has been under threat once more as the Scottish Government announced, for the third time, its decision to cut ties with SMSA altogether and stop funding our vital charity. However, following a lot of hard work and time—our campaign to reverse this decision was a success yet again. The SMSA is now moving forward in a new portfolio of the Scottish Government, the Equality, Inclusion & Human Rights Directorate. We and are currently in discussions for the 2025-2026 budget with hopes of securing the required government funding – like our counterparts in Australia and Ireland receive – to meet the needs of the SMSA and Scottish Men’s Sheds Movement and that this new Equalities team will be the linchpin to achieve our long-term development strategy along with our existing funders.

Our charity is now set to celebrate its first decade in September 2024 and we will strive to secure our footing as the largest member-led male health and wellbeing charity in Scotland.

*The SMSA website in September 2024 suggest that 138 Men’s Sheds were open in Scotland. In 2021, SMSA data for Scotland identified 120 Sheds (Golding, 2021, p.122). This represents a 15 per cent increase in the number of Scottish Sheds over three years.

Maends Modesteder (Denmark) https://sundmand.dk/maends-modesteder/

Input from Mie Moeller Nielsen mie.moeller.nielsen.02@regionh.dk and Svend Aaage Madsen svaa@madsen.mail.dk

In Denmark we have approximately 40 active Mænds Mødesteder (‘Men’s Sheds’) and we’re continuously opening more. We’re now developing a network which aims to include even more different (male) communities, from different organizations, with the purpose of sharing information, experiences and other community-based know-how.

*There were five ‘Maends Modesteder’ (literally ‘men’s meeting place’) Sheds open in Denmark based on the Australian model in 2015. By March 2021 there were 33 open (Golding, 2021, p.294). In September 2024, 37 Sheds were listed as open on the Maends Modesteder website.

Australian Men’s Shed Association (AMSA) https://mensshed.org

Information added by David Helmers david@mensshed.net

There are currently 1,370 members of the Australian Men’s Shed Association: 1,249 of these meet the AMSA definition and criteria of a Men’s Shed, the remaining members are either Community Sheds / Women’s Sheds or Special Interest Groups. 

AMSA also conducts annual membership audits to validate each Shed and verify contact details are as accurate as possible. Australia currently has 86 Cities and 2,450 towns (with 2,300 of these having a population of 5000 or less). Thus Men’s Shed coverage is extensive and nearing capacity, evident in the reduction over recent years in new Shed development. 

AMSA has recently received an additional two-year funding agreement with the Australian Government Department of Health & Aged Care under the National Men’s Health Strategy 2020-2030 for AUD$5.2M. 

This funding is provided for the key operations of AMSA in providing practical support to Men’s Sheds as well as male health initiatives, the Regional Coordinator Initiative and the National Shed Development Program (NSDP). The NSDP is a government grants program specifically for Men’s Sheds, administered by the AMSA on behalf of the Government. 

Overview of Men’s Sheds in Australia to September 2024

Australian Men’s Shed distribution by State 

New South Wales  29.9%
Victoria  21.6%
Queensland  18.4%
Western Australia  10%
South Australia  7.5%
Tasmania 3.3%
Australian Capital Territory  1%
Northern Territory  0.6%
Non-Men’s Shed members registered 7.4%

Shed Activities 

Wellbeing & Health Activities

  • 46% of Sheds have a Member Welfare/Wellbeing Officer.
  • 30% of Sheds actively engage with local health services and providers.
  • 62% of Sheds deliver health and wellbeing activities for members.
  • In the past year, 65% of Sheds provided health resources to members

Health Events

  • 55% of Sheds have held a ‘health event’ in the last 12 months.
  • 64% of Sheds plan to hold a health event in the next 12 months. 
  • 36% of Sheds identified that in the past 12 months, their members have attended a health event delivered by another Shed.

Membership Profile

76.7% of members are aged 66 to 75 years old, 79% of members have a recognised disability 

Shed Operations.

  • 23% of Sheds are register for Deductable Gift Recipient (DGR) Status
  • 47% are registered charities.

Sheds most commonly operate on: 

  • Mondays 43%
  • Tuesdays 60%
  • Wednesdays 65%
  • Thursdays 62% 
  • Fridays 37%
  • Saturdays 21% 
  • Sundays 3%.

Membership Fees 

93% of Sheds charge a membership fee between AUD$20 and $60 per year.

Grants 

70% of Sheds have applied for a mix of Local, State and Federal Government Grants in the last 12 months 

  • 42% for tools and equipment
  • 36% for infrastructure and facilities 
  • 8% for resources.

Website 

Due to the geographic nature of Australia and the vast distances that would be required to travel, the AMSA website continues to play a crucial role in supporting Men’s Sheds as its primary resource. Website visits 2016-2023 total: 5,766,135. The top 10 most visited pages:

  1. Find a Shed
  2. Home Page
  3. Contact us 
  4. AMSA- Resources (members area)
  5. New and Events  
  6. NSDP Grants 
  7. Men’s Health 
  8. What is a Men’s Shed?
  9. Insurance 
  10. Join AMSA.

Men’s Sheds and Men’s Health in Australia

In May 2023, the Department of Health and Aged Care invited federally funded men’s health initiatives to advise the government on the direction of the National Men’s Health Strategy. The result was the formation of the Australian Men and Boys’ Health Alliance (AMBHA), a collaboration between key organisations and experts. 

Members of the alliance include the Australian Men’s Health Forum; Australian Men’s Shed Association; Centre for Male Health; Healthy Male; Movember; Ten to Men Study; The Men’s Table; Australian Fatherhood Research Consortium; MATES; OzHelp and Parents Beyond Breakup. Additional academic input has been provided by Professor James Smith (Flinders University) and Associate Professor Jacqui Macdonald (Deakin University).

AMBHA has produced 8 key recommendations for national action to improve the health of Australian men and boys: 

1. Fund AMBHA to implement the National Men’s Health Strategy. 

2. Fund male-friendly health programs in workplaces and communities. 

3. Fund men’s health initiatives to deliver evidence-based, male- friendly health information. 

4. Fund promotional campaigns that encourage men to engage with the health system and reduce the stigma surrounding ill-health in men. 

5. Fund work to strengthen the capacity of the health system to provide quality care for men and boys. 

6. Establish a formal Parliamentary Inquiry into men’s mental and physical health. 

7. Commission experts from a range of institutions to develop a National Men’s Health Research Strategy. 

8. Fund the development of an evaluation framework for men’s health programs.

This Alliance will continue to work closely together to gain government support for financial commitment to achieve these outcomes.

Summary 

The growth of Men’s Sheds in Australia has slowed oover the past five years. It could be said that Austrlia has reached a saturation point. However one of the lessons learned through AMSA’s development is that although numbers can be impressive and influence interested observers and funding bodies, it can also lead to an unsustainable Men’s Shed environment for the longer term. Men’s Sheds need grassroots community development to grow with a purpose rather than an applied external view that the community needs a Men’s Shed. 

Men’s Sheds in Australia certainly have a men’s health focus. This is primarily due to the fact that AMSA and Sheds have been funded through the Australian Male Health Policy and Strategy since 2010, therefore shaping the movement as a whole. However as many of the Sheds in Australia have been operating for over a decade, they are also growing into community hubs and service groups.

Many Sheds now directly support the communities that supported them, with many giving financial as well as service donations back to their respective communities as well as tothose in need, evident of the support provided by Sheds in times of national disasters etc.

Core funding for AMSA continues from the Department of Health & Aged Care. However this now only makes up 65% of AMSA’s overall budget. The remainder comes from corporate sponsorship and donations. Despite AMSA’s significant growth since 2010, there has been little increase in this core funding. The NSDP has grown from $125,000 per year in 2010 to $1.3m in 2024. 

Regardless of this, AMSA has continued to ‘punch well above its weight’ and is now recognised as a key part of implementing the objectives of the National Male Health Strategy. 

AMSA’s willingness to share information and resources with all Men’s Sheds and National Associations has contributed to the spread of Men’s Shed globally. AMSA will maintain this approach well into the future. 

*AMSA data to April 2021 suggests there were 1,130 Men Sheds in Australia; Golding (2021,p.21) included non-AMSA data to suggest a total of 1,306 Men’s Sheds in Australia.

Where Women’s Sheds are at in Australia and internationally

Information to be added and published later in 2024. More details from Michelle Slater awsacommittee@gmail.com , Establishment Chair, Women’s Sheds Australia  www.womensshedsaustralia.com

*There were only two Women’s Sheds open, both in Australia to 2010. In 2021, 124 Women’s Sheds had been opened globally, one half (61) of which were in Australia (Golding, 2021, p.397). Barry Golding, Lucia Carragher& Annette Foley published a peer reviewed scoping study of Women’s Sheds in 2021: see Golding, B., Carragher, L., & Foley, A. (July 2021) The Women’s Shed movement: Scoping the field internationally, Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 61(2 ), pp. 150-174. Accessible at http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/HandleResolver/1959.17/180068

International Men’s Shed Summary

The Men’s Shed data and graph, below confirm that:

  • The number of Men’s Sheds open internationally now exceeds 3,300 and continues to grow.
  • Most of the recent rapid growth in Men’s Sheds has been in the UK and Canada.
  • The numbers have tend to plateau in most other countries.
  • Sheds in Ireland and the US were most negatively impacted by COVID from 2020.

Data below, used to create Graph, above

YearAustraliaUKIrelandScotNZCanadaUS DenTotal
199822
199977
20001111
20011919
20022424
20032525
20043030
2009300111303
20159161272441854451368
202011308104601201212833332735
20241200118045013813513530373305

Number of Sheds per capita

The numbers of Men’s Sheds open is only one indicator of Shed or movement national traction or success. The table below takes account of population, creating a ‘Shed density’ per 100,000 total national population. 

NationsFirst Shed201520212024
Ireland20094.98.38.8
Australia19933.815.14.5
New Zealand20071.22.52.6
Scotland20130.32.02.5
UK20090.21.01.8
Denmark2015 0.60.6
Canada20080.010.10.34
US2016 0.0010.001

Shed Density (Sheds/100,000 total population) in nations with Men’s Shed movements

Per capita, Men’s Sheds in Ireland (8.8 Sheds per 100,000) remain twice as popular than in Australia (4.5 Sheds per 100,000) in 2024. In the future, if Sheds in the UK and Canada were to continue to spread and achieve similar Shed densities as achieved in Australia, there might be as many as 3,000 Sheds across the UK and 1,800 Sheds across Canada. Extrapolation of the current (2024) growth trajectory in the UK suggests there is likely to be 1,500 Sheds in the UK by 2030 and perhaps 500 Sheds in Canada.

Remembering John Field

John Field died suddenly and too soon on 25 March 2024, ten years into retirement from paid academic work age 74. I am the same age and retired around the same time. This post is not only about remembering John’s contribution but acknowledging others whose contributions have similarly influenced my thinking, becoming colleagues and friends. Lest we forget.

Professor John Field, as Sir Alan Tuckett summarised in his generous and appropriate tribute in the International Journal of Lifelong Education in April 2024 (https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02601370.2024.2344348 , was ‘… a charismatic and distinguished scholar, policy adviser and internationalist. … John was recognised widely as one of the outstanding contributors to the development of adult learning and education of his generation, and he combined serious intellectual rigour with great personal warmth, curiosity and a capacity to make complex ideas accessible.’

John had a huge impact on my own thinking and research about social capital, community, adult and informal learning. Some of these ideas coalesced in my own research over two decades about older men’s informal learning, Men’s Sheds and most recently Women’s Sheds in community settings. I’ve often leaned on John’s work with others for the UK Government Office of Science Foresight Project published as Mental capital and wellbeing in 2009.

Alan Tuckett acknowledged that John became:

‘… an early advocate for the work of Men’s Sheds, and of many of the local community initiatives developed despite the paucity of public support. John looked beyond the boundaries of structured learning to see what motivated and inspired
adults to invent their own strategies to learn effectively. It was an approach that made his blog [The Learning Professor] such an entertaining and illuminating read. More than that, it was what made the time spent with John so richly rewarding.

It is appropriate in remembering John Field, that I acknowledge here the invaluable support, friendship, advice and inspiration I’ve had over the decades from others in the field, many who who are still ‘kicking goals’ both in Australia and overseas. This particularly includes Professor Annette Foley (Federation University), Professor John McDonald and Professor Tony Dreise (Charles Sturt University) in Australia; soon to be retired Professor Michael Osborne (Glasgow University) and the late Professor Peter Jarvis, as well as other UK-based researchers, Sir Alan Tuckett and Professor Peter Lavender. Peter and Alan at once stage worked out of the former National Institute of Adult and Community Education (NIACE) in Leicester and more recently at University of Wolverhampton.

It is no accident that Dr Veronica McGivney also worked at NIACE and similarly influenced and encouraged my early thinking around the same time Men’s Sheds started, with Excluded men: Men who are missing from education and training in 1999, and Men earn women learn in 2004. Veronica is still kicking goals in 2024, writing fiction and painting. In Ireland, I have enjoyed strong support and friendship in my research also from Dr Rob Mark and Dr Lucia Carragher, and in New Zealand from Dr Brian Findsen.

Six Peaks Speak 8

It’s been a long haul. The Six Peaks Speak: Unsettling legacies in southern Dja Dja Wurrung Country book manuscript, currently 132,000 words, 334 pages has today (18 April 2024) been sent to the publishers, Common Ground Research Networks in Illinois, US. Getting all the ducks lined up: text, maps, images, references has been a huge job in recent months, made so much more enjoyable with the skills, expertise and contributions of Clive Willman, assisted in the editing process by Elizabeth Eager. The many other people who generously assisted are acknowledged in the book.

I acknowledge the invaluable support provided by my 2023 State Library Victoria Creative Regional Fellowship. I said goodbye to my delightful office under the SLV Dome on 28 March, soon to be occupied by a new, 2024 Fellow.

Our book manuscript now goes for review, then revisions and copy editing with publication likely approximately October 2024. A formal launch is planned in early December on Country, along with a series of Great Dividing Trail walks and local community presentations specific to each mountain (currently called Kooroocheang, Beckworth, Greenock, Tarrengower, Alexander and Franklin) in the lead in to International Mountain Day in 11 December. I’ll post here again when we have firm details about book publication, cost and availability. Please send me a message if you want to be placed on a list. I can then let you know when the book is available and options for buying a copy.

I acknowledge the strong and generous support for this research and writing project on Country from the Dja Dja Wurrung traditional owners of the six mountains, working through Rodney Carter, Dja Dja Wurrung Group CEO. DJAARA have agreed to be a partner in promoting International Mountain Day on Country in 2024 in collaboration with Outdoors Victoria, Great Dividing Trail Association and Federation University.

‘Breaking Bad’? …

These objects were found thoughtfully (or thoughtlessly) dumped on an intersection while I was bike riding 2km north of Clunes between Christmas and New Year 2023. Artistic assemblage, dropped by Santa Claus or dirty linen too hot to handle? If only these objects could talk.

Includes random plastic tubing and piping, ear protection, hat and clothing, coat hangers, rubber gloves, WD40, plastic tub, tape measure, knife, Book ‘The rise and fall of Adolf Hitler’, padlock, a CD of Handel’s orchestral music, children’s books … and a receipt from Coburg for a relatively large amount of cough syrup and throat lozenges (containing pseudoephedrine: a sought-after chemical precursor in the illicit manufacture of methamphetamine).

Donald Wall of Achievement

Thanks to my sister, Judith Hastings who represented me in Donald, northwestern Victoria on 22 December 2023, at the the unveiling of the permanent testimonial, below, added to the ‘Donald Lions Wall of Achievement’ in Woods Street, Donald.

‘Donald Lions Wall of Achievement’

Thanks also to the Donald Lions Club for this nomination and recognition, designed ‘to encourage other local young people from Donald and District to reach their absolute potential’.

Six Peaks Speak 7

Good news on three main fronts at the end of the 2023 SLV Fellowship.

First, the main research and writing outcome in the form of a book, Six Peaks Speak: Unsettling Legacies in southern Dja Dja Wurrung Country with Clive Willman as second author will be published during the third quarter of 2024 by Common Ground Research Networks (CGRN) in the US (in Illinois).

Second, a coalition of organisations have shown interest in supporting a celebration revolving around International, Mountain Day held on 11 December each year. These include Dja Dja Wurrung Clans Aboriginal Corporation, Great Dividing Trail Association, Federation University and Outdoors Victoria.

Third, the State Library has generously extended use of my Fellowship room under the Dome to 30 March 2024.

There is a lot of ‘fine tuning’ to do in the New Year before our book manuscript is finalised before the 30 April 2024 contract deadline, including keying in the maps and photographs, checking sources and references and polishing the text.

I am grateful to SLV for this once in a lifetime Fellowship opportunity, with the invaluable support during 2023 of Suzie Gasper, Senior Programmer, Audience Engagement, and Sarah Ryan, Senior Librarian, Victorian and Australian Collections. Countless other people have generously helped along the way who will be thanked in the book.

Six Peaks Speak 6

Not the end of the story, but appropriately this is a very brief post #6, written on 17 November 2023, just 6 weeks from the formal end of the SLV Fellowship.

The Six Peaks Speak: Unsettling Legacies in Southern Dja Dja Wurrung Country book manuscript, for which Clive Willman is now confirmed as second author, is now complete (8 Chapters, 96,000 words, plus 10,000 words of footnotes) and under consideration by a prospective publisher. Hopefully the final post in this series during late December after I return on 10 December from bike riding with four fellow Erratics in New Zealand / Aotearoa might have some good news about a book contract to share.

A Six Peaks Speak ‘show and tell’ is being planned at SMB in downtown Ballarat to coincide with International Mountain Day (2-4pm December 11). Organised through Federation University, it’s my opportunity to share the findings of the research and book writing project in the community with a wide range of interested stakeholders including people and organisations who have generously advised and provided assistance along the way.

I’m hopeful that beyond the life of my Six Peaks Speak project, and thinking globally and acting locally, Mountain Day in Australia in 2024 might be bigger and better. Watch this space ….

Mindful Cities Podcast

I recently contributed to a thoughtful podcast for a series called ‘Common Ground’, produced for an international audience via an organisation based in Greece called TOPOSOPHY.

If you are interested in how communities are dealing with loneliness around the world, including through Men’s Sheds, you might like to listen and share with others. ‘From little things, big things grow’. What follows is the podcast blurb and a link to listen.

How can urban spaces support the mental wellbeing of a community? What might a morning spent gardening do for someone’s happiness? And how can the simple concept of a shed bring people together? In this episode, Robin Hewings – Programme Director at Campaign to End Loneliness UK – breaks down how the built environment impacts our wellbeing, author and academic Barry Golding chats to us about the phenomenon of Men’s Sheds in Australia and Philip Nichols CEO of Spitalfields City Farm in London explains the benefits of community gardens’.

Six Peaks Speak 5

27 September 2023 Update

It’s been a very busy six weeks on the SLV Fellowship Project since returning from a winter break in Japan, mainly with more writing and editing. I’ve also done several field trips to Mount Beckworth and Mount Greenock and returned to check Crown Files in Bendigo and Ballarat. My Cultural Heritage approval came through DJAARA a month ago, also giving me access in 2023 to the the ACHRIS (Australian Cultural Heritage data base) for nominated sites. I’ve put all my many images (maps, photos, copies of documents) in order and flagged in the text in each chapter where they might go.

Clive Willman has generously assisted with lots of things: adding new and interesting geological content, reading, commenting on and editing drafts of all chapters; helping set up LiDAR and maps on my phone and setting up a shared Dropbox. Most recently Clive has greatly assisting with a ‘show and tell’ in Daylesford on 29 September which he’ll join me for (detail below), and has created several new maps and diagrams.

Partly for legal liability and organisational convenience reasons, Great Dividing Trail Association has give permission to badge three events as ‘GDTA assisted’. It will involve two tours (Mount Kooroocheang and Mount Franklin areas) and an evening presentation consistent with the outcomes I anticipated this Friday and Saturday over the Grand Final Long Weekend. Pleasingly, there has been total of 70 registrations for the three events, and the weather forecast looks perfect! Cooperation with private landholders on whose country we walk around Kooroocheang has been very generous. Full details of the three events is below [NOTE: The Kooroocheang tour is booked out]

————————————————

Six Peaks Speak: Unsettling changes in southern Dja Dja Wurrung Country

Field Trips in Mt Kooroocheang & Mt Franklin areas, 29 & 30 Sept 2023 (both 9.30am-2.30pm) & Community Presentation, Daylesford Neighborhood Centre, 29 Sept 2023, 8.00-10.00pm 

Professor Barry Golding AM, State Library Victoria Fellow, 2023

Barry Golding is researching a book about six mountains in southern Dja Dja Wurrung Country as part of a 2023 State Library Victoria Fellowship. The peaks are today known as Mounts Kooroocheang, Beckworth, Greenock, Tarrengower, Alexander & Franklin.

Barry is leading two separate field trips on Friday and Saturday, 29 & 30 September 2023 (Grand Final long weekend). There is a separate but associated presentation in Daylesford on the Friday evening 8-10pm. The events seek to highlight some of the emerging findings from Barry’s SLV Fellowship, organized in association the Great Dividing Trail Association (GDTA). 

Details are as below. Registration for the field trips is essential via the links provided. Numbers are limited. NOTE: There is no longer a requirement to register for the community presentation. Just turn up if you are interested!

Field Trips

Registration essential for either or both field trips. Non-GDTA members who register will pay $5 cash on the day to cover insurance. Registrants need to anticipate sharing transport beyond the start. We will visit several sites on each trip. A total of 4 km of easy paddock or roadside walking is involved for each trip. Dress for the predicted weather & wear sturdy boots; bring your own lunch, snacks and drinks.

  • Friday 29 Sept, 9.30am-2.30pm: Field trip in the Gurutjanga (Mount Kooroocheang) area. Meet in the hamlet of Kooroocheang. BOOKED OUT
  • Saturday 30 Sept 9.30am-2.30pm: Field trip in the Lalkambuk (Mount Franklin) area. Meet at main intersection in Franklinford. REGISTRATION LINK

Community Presentation

A free Friday evening (8.00-10.00pm, Friday 29 Sept) presentation by Barry Golding at Daylesford assisted by Clive Willman (Castlemaine) at Daylesford Neighbourhood Centre, 13 Camp Street). It will focus on some lesser known, emerging findings about unsettling changes to the three peaks within the Hepburn Shire: Gurutjanga (Mount Kooroocheang), Lalkambuk (Mount Franklin) and Nyaninuk (Mount Beckworth). No need to book.

Barry Golding acknowledges State Library Victoria (SLV) and Dja Dja Wurrung Clans Aboriginal Corporation for their support for this 2023 Fellowship

Six Peaks Speak 4

25 June 2023 Update

It’s now seven weeks since my 7 May ‘Six Peaks Speak 3’ update. This has been a very intensive and time consuming writing phase. At least one day each week has been spent at State Library Victoria researching new leads and tying up the many loose ends. Another day each week (when winter weather permits) has been spent in the field, walking on each peaks and talking to people in the local community.

My Draft Chapter Contents for the book, whose working title is Six Peaks Speak: Unsettling Changes in Southern Dja Dja Wurrung Country, is as below.

  • Chapter 1 Grounding
  • Chapter 2 Home Ground: Gurutjanga  / Mount Kooroocheang
  • Chapter 3 Common Ground: Nyaninuk / Mount Beckworth
  • Chapter 4 Grazed: Durt Burnayi / Mount Greenock
  • Chapter 5 Mined: Dharrang Gauwa / Mount Tarrengower
  • Chapter 6 Quarried: Leanganook / Mount Alexander
  • Chapter 7 Erased: Lalkambuk / Mount Franklin
  • Chapter 8 The ‘Good Country’ in Between
  • Chapter 9 Reconnecting Peaks, People and Place

Chapters 1 to 5 have been completed in early Draft with a target length of 10,000 words each. My plan is to complete Drafts Chapters for the other two peaks, Mount Alexander and Mount Franklin, by 8 July (in two weeks). 

Below is the content template I am using to structure and write each peak-specific chapter. Some headings will change. 

  • Setting the Scene
  • Behind the Scenes
  • The Peak, People and Places
    • Peak
    • People
    • Places
  • Ground Up
    • Big Picture
    • Rocks 
    • Ecology
    • Community
  • Unsettling
  • Legacies
    • Legacy Theme 1
    • Legacy Theme 2
    • Legacy Theme 3
    • Legacy Theme 4
  • Managing
  • Exploring

I previously identified four possible ‘Legacy Themes’ for each of the six peaks in my ‘Six Peaks Speak 2’ post. Most of these have been adopted unchanged. Several will change as writing and editing progresses.

Clive Willman’s assistance has been invaluable in the past six weeks, including reading and critically commenting on draft chapters. Clive provided LiDAR for Mount Kooroocheang and Mount Beckworth. He has also provided a valuable and insightful, big picture, Digital Elevation Model map inclusive of all six peaks, overlain by the main geological units and the footprint of both Protectorates. 

Clive has actively participated in some of the fieldwork and is contributing his geological expertise and experience to help write up and edit the sections about the rocks for each peak. My intention, as already flagged with SLV, is for Clive to be properly acknowledged as a second author on the final book manuscript by virtue of his significant anticipated contribution.

I am taking a four week, midyear, winter break from 18 July. I plan to resume work refreshed after the break on 19 August, to start to write Chapters 8 & 9. My next update is planned for 3 September. During September 2023, I plan to have a sufficiently polished draft manuscript comprising two Chapters, with Contents and Synopsis, to approach a prospective publisher.

Six Peaks Speak 3

7 May 2023

I have made lots of positive progress since my second (late February 2023) blog: via on Country immersion, First Nations liaison, community presentations, serendipitous connections as well as at the State Library Victoria in the past two months. Exploratory writing of the first book chapters is now underway.

On Country immersion:

The enervating and challenging South Coast Track 86km backpack walk in remote Tasmania; 260km supported Great South West Walk, a remarkable immersive symphony in four parts in remote western Victoria). Importantly, these walks during March took me away from my own landscape to reflect, think and plan in other inspiring places and First Nations landscapes.


Two ‘Six Peaks Peek’, by invitation on Country walking tours with invited friends, local landholders, colleagues and other SLV Fellows to all six peaks; on 26 March, to flank of Mount Kooroocheang, and summits of Beckworth & Greenock with 16 participants; on 6 May with 17 participants to summits of Mounts Tarrengower, Alexander & Franklin, ‘bookended’ by visits to nearby Neereman & Franklinford 1840s Aboriginal Protectorate sites. Intended to field test and get feedback on interpretive themes and options.


Franklinford Protectorate Township walk with Kyneton U3A on 21 April (18 participants).


•Several exploratory field visits, including previewing sites for the Six Peaks Peek Tours and visits to 10 very recently identified oven mounds in the Mount Beckworth and Kooroocheang areas.


• CresFest interpretive walks for GDTA on Creswick Heritage Walk 1 & 2 April (total 24 participants).

First Nations liaison


Meetings with Elder, Uncle Ricky Nelson, in Castlemaine on 13 April & 4 May, also planned on Country for 9 May.

Meeting planned 10 May at SLV with Harley Dunolly Lee, Project Officer, Language Repatriation, Dja Dja Wurrung Clans Aboriginal Corporation & PhD Candidate at Monash University.

On Country filming with Uncle Ricky Nelson planned for 9 May at Neereman & Franklinford, to contribute to a First Nations themed Reconciliation Week display at Daylesford Historical Society.

Community presentations


On an ‘Unsettling’ theme, to Newstead Landcare Group (150 participants, 18 April).


On a ‘Six Peaks Speak: Unsettling changes in southern Dja Dja Wurrung Country’ theme to Ballarat Bushwalking and Outdoor Club (40 participants) on 4 May.

Serendipitous connections


Castlemaine-based friend & geologist, Clive Willman after my Newstead Landcare presentation, alerted me to the availability of LIDAR (an acronym for “light detection and ranging”) imaging data for both Mount Beckworth and Mount Kooroocheang inclusive of their flanks. Clive has since, very generously, put huge time and effort into creating and sharing LIDAR files, overlain with historic map layers. With the software and LIDAR files loaded on my laptop, I am now able to ‘remove’ the vegetation cover and zoom in to search for signs of what might have happened and where.


Related to the above, Clive found an 1890s geological plan for Bullarook (inclusive of Mount Kooroocheang) made by James Stirling with 8 ‘blackfellows ovens’ marked, seven of which have likely not since been recorded. Follow up with the two current private landholders to ‘ground truth’ and formally record these oven mounds is underway.

Several recent productive meetings, conversations and field visits with Clive Willman have confirmed the likelihood of Clive assisting me further, in a currently open-ended manner.

At State Library Victoria


Second stage on site searching, including SLV Newspaper collection.

Helpful conversations with Suzie Gasper, Senior Programmer, Audience Engagement on ‘where to next’ with researching, writing and publishing and well as with possible SLV themed presentations or fields trips (my Fellowship Liaison Librarian, Sarah Ryan, Senior Librarian, Victorian and Australian Collections has been on extended leave).

Writing and editing


Working through my files, distilling and pulling together the many possible themes for each of the six peaks, on the computer screen and in words, is a very big undertaking. I have started, in between the above, to attempt to write. In the process, I find out what is missing, what is superfluous and what themes might ‘sing’ best in my book, and in what order they might be introduced to the reader.


This intensive time consuming writing and editing process will be my main focus for the next few months. I’ve summarised below how far I’ve come.


Where to beyond the fieldwork? 3,500 words. This is my attempt to sort out, in my head and in words, what it is that I am most interested in communicating in my book and how I might tell the story, ideally in a fresh, engaging, accessible and authentic way.


Chapter 2 Mount Kooroocheang, First Draft 80% complete; reorganizing and editing is underway in Draft 2; Chapter 3, Mount Beckworth, writing has commenced.

Six Peaks Speak 2

Update 2, FEBRUARY 2023

I’m penning this second, brief reflective monthly update on my Six Peaks Speak Fellowship in late February just before I head off for two long and challenging bushwalks during March. I will return in late March to my previous pattern of local research, field visits, weekly visits to Melbourne accessing resources in the State Library Victoria (SLV) and also the Public Records Office (PROV), meaning that I won’t pen my third update until late April 2023.

What I’ve done & seen, who I’ve met …

Most of the ‘simple’ library searches at SLV and PROV, using the names of the mountains and nearby places and landmarks as key search terms, are now exhausted. I’ve downloaded files and taken photos of lots of original documents (reports, maps, newspaper articles, correspondence) and filed them by peak name, summarising and linking the information using OneNote. The collected hard copies collected are now in six bulging files, which if stacked would be around a half metre high. A seventh file includes ‘general’ material of some relevance to all of the peaks, including resource indexes, theoretical perspectives, research and search methodologies, plus writing and book publishing options.

On days when the recent summer heat has backed off slightly, I’ve done exploratory on-ground field work including climbing Mount Tarrengower (three trips), Mount Beckworth (two trips), Mount Franklin and Mount Alexander (one trip each). Weather willing, more targeted field trips will resume in April inclusive also of Mount Greenock and Mount Kooroocheang. I have identified local informants for targeted, further ground exploration on Mounts Beckworth, Alexander and Franklin. Two public Peak Walks under the auspices of the Great Dividing Trail Association (GDTA) are now locked into the GDTA walk calender for 25 June (on Mount Beckworth) and 27 August (on Mount Alexander). 

I have also penned an outline for a ‘Six Peaks Peek’ on ground activity designed to introduce the public to all six peaks, either on one huge day, or more likely (for most people) over two full days with an overnight stop at the foot of Tarrengower in Maldon. The activity could either be guided or self-guided. In order to ‘field test’ the idea, I’ve tentatively proposed a Great Dividing Trail Association members’ ‘by invitation’, one day ‘Sunrise to Sunset’ reconnaissance tour commencing at my place in Kingston at 6.30am on Sunday 23 April.

This month I met in Bendigo with representatives of DJAARA, the registered Dja Dja Wurrung traditional owner group entity. Harley Dunolly-Lee, a PhD scholar, Dja Dja Wurrung descendant and also Project Officer, Language Repatriation at DJAARA, has helped to unravel the meaning behind some of the poorly documented original peak names. Harley’s generous contribution is acknowledged as ‘personal communication’ in the peak summaries later in this update. I plan during 2023 to progressively give the original First Nations names precedence.

This month I’ve made useful contact with most of the historical societies and museum adjacent to the peaks, and already made productive visits to those located in Daylesford, Guildford and Maldon. During April, I have made plans to visit like organisations in Newstead, Castlemaine, Clunes, Creswick and Talbot.

I’ve made contact with the Parks Victoria Rangers responsible for all five peaks which lie within public reserves, via the Parks offices located in Sawpit Gully, Creswick (responsible for the management of Mount Franklin and Mount Beckworth), in Castlemaine (responsible for both Mount Tarrengower & Mount Alexander) and Inglewood (responsible for Mount Greenock).

My next search strategy will be to focus on documentary evidence of the emergent enumerated themes (that follow): at SLV, at PROV and also online, which are illustrative of these themes.

Serendipity continues to be important vector in my learning. By absolute chance, during a reconnaissance visit to the Mount Beckworth summit I met Leslie Scott, author of a recent book, Once were wild about her interactions with wild brumbies on the flanks of Mount Beckworth. Aside from showing me several springs, Leslie was able to guide me to a remarkable and new (for me) copse of cork oaks within the southernmost extension of the pine plantation.

This month I accidentally discovered the State Library Staff Lounge on Level 6. As the lift opened to the lounge, I was confronted by a refrigerated and illuminated drinks cabinet boasting ‘Mount Franklin’ bottled water. The back story of how the drinks cabinet made its way to Level 6 in the upper bowels of the State Library won’t be in my book. But the story of how an ancient mound spring and nearby volcanic crater on Dja Dja Wurrung Country were both renamed expropriated to become national icon for an American multinational beverage company surely will.

So how has my plan evolved?

I have become aware of three ‘big picture’ insights, common themes and generalities from the Six Peaks research I’ve conducted so far. First, while each of the six peaks is distinct and different, the five peaks which remain publicly owned today were belatedly ‘saved’ as reserves by virtue of their early designation as ‘Town Commons’ for their nearby mining communities. This meant that whilst ‘reserved’ as public Commons, they were unfenced and subject to heavy, prolonged and largely uncontrolled exploitation: for grazing, timber and firewood removal, and in the case of two granite peaks, one or more of quarrying, gold mining or sand extraction.

Second, all of these Commons, later to become Reserves, were subject to almost a century of political and environmental pressure from local (and particularly from adjacent) private landholders seeking their alienation, or an opportunity to lease public land in order to extend their holdings. Third, the intensity of this exploitation was greatest for peaks with rapacious mining underground communities on their flanks. Tarrengower is the prime example. Not a stick of timber was left on the peak by around 1870. And Maldon, ironically, became Australia’s first notable heritage town.

In order to avoid repetition of themes, I propose to introduce each peak in turn, emphasising the most distinctive features summarised under just four to five ‘themes’ for each peak. My short list of emergent theme headings for each peak are enumerated below. While some of these themes are common and will apply to other peaks, they will be dealt with (and extrapolated where appropriate) when first introduced.

At this early stage I propose to introduce the peaks in a clockwise order in the order below, commencing with the only privately owned peak Gurutjanga, whose anglicised First Nations name has been ‘Kooroocheang’. While unique and imposing, looming 200m above its surrounds, the volcanic peak is broadly illustrative of the many issues associated with heritage management of the 400 other volcanic centres (with 700 eruption points), almost all in private ownership within the Newer Volcanic Province. As Costermans and VanDenBerg emphasise in their remarkable Stories beneath our feet (2022, p.426) book, this Volcanic Province is distinctive even by world standards.

Gurutjanga / Mount Kooroocheang

Gurutjanga / Gurutjang = ‘spring of brolga’ (Dunolly-Lee, pers. comm. 9 Feb 2023, needs further research)

Emergent themes:

  1. At Contact: Ceremony & Ovens in Southern Dja Dja Wurrung Country
  2. The uncomfortable legacy of unsettling: John Hepburn as a case study
  3. Towers, memorials & interpretation
  4. Heritage dilemmas on private land.

Nyaninuk / Mount Beckworth

Nyaninuk (‘his, her, it’s back of the neck, nape’), referring to the mountain’s back of the neck: Dunolly-Lee, pers. comm., 9 Feb 2023)

Emergent themes:

  1. Attempts at alienation: the Seeger case study
  2. Exotics as heritage (Aleppo pine, Cork oak plantations, Radiata Pine)
  3. Sand mining, orchids and birds since the 1950s
  4. Rock climbing & bouldering since 1980 (also at Mt Alexander).

The Crown files available from Mount Beckworth include copious evidence of attempted private alienation. The file of correspondence from the Danish born Leberecht Seeger and wife Annie [Lyons] Seeger and their attempt over several decades to secure land from the Crown on the NE of the current reserve, including for their ill-fated daughter, Sophia, provides an potentially excellent case study.

Durt Burnayi / Mount Greenock 

Durt Burnayi (durt = star, burnayi = young women: Dunolly-Lee, pers. comm., 9 Feb 2023)

Emergent themes:

  1. The geological legacy and the carefully managed ‘mammaloid’ hills
  2. Australia Felix and the uncomfortable Mitchell legacy
  3. The contested Talbot Common
  4. Mining legacy of the Greenock Deep Leads.

Dharrang Gauwa / Mount Tarrengower

Dharrang Gauwa (‘big rough mountain’; Dunolly-Lee, pers. comm 2023)

Emergent themes:

  1. The Liarga bulluk Clan / Tarrang tribe and the Raffaello Carboni / Gilburnia / Jerrbung connection
  2. The 1840-1 Neereman Aboriginal Protectorate nearby
  3. The early loss of trees and the recent arrival of Wheel Cactus
  4. Fire spotting and towers on Tarrengower.
  5. The heritage, environmental & community legacy of colonisation and gold.

Liyanganuk Banyul / Mount Alexander

Harley Dunolly Lee provided a copy of a Mount Alexander Report that he undertook on behalf of the Mount Alexander Shire concerning the place name of Liyanyuk Banyul/ Liyanganyuk Banyul ‘Mount Alexander’. Harley notes (pers. comm., 2023) that ‘The community have not chosen an official name but the report looks at all available evidence on the name for this place’. Harleys’ suggestion is to ‘meantime include all variants because Dja Dja Wurrung old people were multilingual and each clan had their dialect and word for specific places’.

Emergent themes:

  1. Harcourt granite quarrying sites on the mountain from the 1860s
  2. Women’s sericulture (silk plantations) in the mid 1870s
  3. Ill -fated Koala Parks
  4. The value of peaks as refugia (Ballantinia: Shepherds Purse case study)
  5. Walking and mountain bike track construction & use in the past three decades.

Lalkambuk / Mount Franklin

Lalkambuk (‘split head’) mountain; Larni Barramul crater (‘home, nest of the emu’: both Dunolly-Lee, pers. comm., 9 Feb 2023)

Emergent themes:

  1. Site of Ceremony
  2. The legacy of the Franklinford Aboriginal Protectorate
  3. The politics of naming: Jim Crow & John Franklin
  4. The legacy of Springs: The Mill Stream & Limestone Spring & Coca Cola
  5. Why are we privileging pines?

The ‘Oval’ Beneath the six peaks: The volcanic plains and woodlands

Emergent themes:

  1. Dja Dja Wurrung people, population, Clans and language
  2. It’s all about the rocks …
  3. The Bacchus Marsh Formation fluvio-glacials & First Nations quarries
  4. Interlocking ecosystems and ecotones.

While it’s ‘all about the rocks’, none of this is yet set in stone. As always, I welcome feedback, comment and suggestions to b.golding@federation.edu.au about ways of improving on and enhancing this project plan, just two months into one year of research and writing.

I acknowledge that this project is an outcome of a generous State Library Victoria Fellowship

Six Peaks Speak 1

Four Week Reflective update on my State Library Victoria Fellowship to 27 January 2023

One month into 2023 and it’s time for me to reflect and take stock. I’m penning what follows for several good reasons. Firstly, it helps me keep track and record progress and think about ‘where to next’. Second, it helps inform the many stakeholders in this Six Peaks Speak research and writing project who are keen to advise and assist me about where some of the the missing bits or ‘lacunae’ currently are.

In case you’re not familiar with the Six Peaks Speak Project, you’ll find my ‘big picture’ plan for the State Library Victoria Fellowship during 2023 at https://barrygoanna.com/7-2/

If after reading this update you have ideas and suggestions in relation to any other the six peaks, please contact me!

Two days each week during January I’ve spent ferreting through whatever resources come to the surface, by searching the names and obvious thematic connections to the six mountains (Kooroocheang, Beckworth, Greenock, Tarrengower, Alexander, Franklin), mainly in the State Library Victoria (SLV) collection but also the Public Records Office of Victoria (PROV) in North Melbourne.

I’ve also accessed the available historic Crown files for the five mountains surrounded by public reserves. These files are mostly held in the Ballarat ‘Glass House’ and Epsom (Bendigo) regional land manager’s offices. And I’ve put out feelers to eight local historical societies and people with a local knowledge of and interest in each of the Peaks, including the Dja Dja Wurrung traditional owners.

Importantly, I’ve also had time to think while travelling up and down to Melbourne on the train, and particularly riding my bicycle and walking along quiet backroads in the vicinity of the two Peaks closest to home, Mounts Beckworth and Kooroocheang. In the process, I’ve sought distant lines of sight from elevated spots along the way to the other four peaks, Franklin, Tarrengower, Greenock and Alexander. In the process, I’ve come up with tentative new ideas for introducing others to each of the six Peaks.

I penned this reflective note offline in the Top Deck Lounge of the Spirit of Tasmania in Bass Strait heading north for home via Geelong. Being at sea without the internet, my notes or my usual references was actually quite liberating. I’m reminded of one of the 1850s Eureka Rebellion heroes, Raefello Carboni who began penning his Italian opera, Gilburnia, inspired in part by his First Nations experiences near Mount Tarrengower in Dja Dja Wurrung Country. It was amongst the flying fish in the Bay of Bengal on the way back to Italy that Carboni’s acknowledged that his ideas for the opera actually started to take shape. There were no flying fish in Bass Strait.

Getting my head around the practicalities of searching for and extracting original records, as well as sifting through and storing the evidence I’ve collected, including via online searches, have been challenging. Given it takes at least 4.5 hours of travel each day from home in southern Dja Dja Wurrung Country to and from Melbourne, working out efficient ways of preordering and accessing resources via libraries and archives online was an essential first hurdle. So too was starting to understand the vagaries of the rabbit warren of offices and collections that comprises SLV, and also the rules and regulations for safe handling that underpin original document accessibility.

At this early stage, my search strategy is deliberately wide. While I know several mountains and their crosscutting themes, particularly Franklin and Kooroocheang pretty well already, others, particularly Tarrengower and Beckworth, are much less well known to me, and the Crown files available to me are far from complete. As might be anticipated, some leads have proved fruitless. Others, like the 1870s photo of old growth eucalyptus forest within the Larnibarramul Crater (at Mt Franklin) and the PROV file about the former Victorian Ladies Sericultural [silkworm] Association reserves in Mount Alexander, are serendipitous, highly informative and insightful.

Beyond the uneven and inevitably patchy evidence that is emerging about each of the mountains themselves, there is the important question of what is of interest and importance to me and also to prospective readers. How might others use my book to gain new insights and to explore more? How might the evidence I find be ordered and presented? Why am I interested in peaks? What is distinctive about each peak? What should I put in and to leave out? Whose story and voice is more important? In what circumstances should the narrative become autoethnographic? What is different about my book and other product dissemination strategies that has not already been attempted?

I have had several timely and important practical breakthroughs. Procuring and setting up a laptop after eight years in ‘retiremen’t without one (I’ve previously used an iPad when on the move) was made easier with advice from our son, Karri. So too was the usefulness of the OneNote application made clear via sound advice from our daughter, Tanja. The wisdom and experience of Sarah, my SLV mentor librarian has gently and ably steered me to several new and positive sources, places and in new directions.

Aside from copying, note taking and transcribing, I have taken lots of photos on my phone and scanned images of original documents, maps and historic photographs. I sense that these images have the potential to lift’ and illuminate my book as well as critically inform the historical narrative. Photos and maps in particular have the potential to subvert the dominant paradigm about what the country was like as well as how and why it has changed. In a similar way that Von Guerard’s painting of Tower Hill helped restore and revegetate the iconic crater, there is the potential for images and maps of all peaks in this project to reshape the way we perceive, revegetate and acknowledge First Nations people’s Voice and ongoing contributions to our own peaks and landscapes. Importantly, they will also point to better and more sustainable ways of managing them, inclusive of First Nations values, interests and imperatives.

So what do I know or perceive after one month of researching that is new or different from what I originally proposed? First, I have become acutely aware that the six peaks I have chosen to feature circumscribe a broad and relatively fertile oval, volcanic plain, previously grassland or woodland, and that what has happened within the oval below the peaks is also an important, relevant and interesting part of my narrative. Second, there are at least a dozen other secondary peaks within ‘the oval’ whose presence in the landscape might also form part of the story. The oval and these secondary peaks might sit in a separate additional book chapter, and provide waypoints relevant to my book’s invitation for people to come and explore and make sense of the remarkable area themselves.

What follows summarises how I anticipate each Peak Chapter might be shaped and the order they might be introduced, moving in an anti clockwise direction around the oval commencing with Kooroocheang.

Kooroocheang is qualitatively different to the other five peaks. Being in private ownership it is much less well known or interpreted. Its physical presence, status and importance as a Dja Dja Wurrung ceremonial site encircled by nearby oven mounds and the swift and brutal nature of dispossession and unsettling by John Hepburn and others will lie at the heart of the Kooroocheang narrative. This chapter will paint a picture of and emphasise the disconnect between what was a diverse, productive and complex ecotone (juxtaposition of different ecosystems) in Southern Dja Dja Wurrung Country, inclusive of the uncomfortable and unsettling legacy of Hepburn.

Mount Franklin’s story which will follow is tragic on a number of levels. It is a narrative about loss of a classic and relatively young volcanic crater, its flanks and crater stripped bare, commencing with loss of its original status as a First Nations gathering and ceremonial site, the development and demise of the genocidal Aboriginal Protectorate on its flanks following Alexander Mollison’s brief unsettling, the creation of a Town Common, the loss of a nearby unique and ancient Mineral Spring, and the recent invention of Mount Franklin as an iconic Australian brand once the spring had been destroyed.

The loss of Mount Franklin’s original vegetation will be about ‘death by a thousand cuts’, from grazing, timber removal, wildfire and rabbit infestation, to the final 1950s Forest Commission indignity: being totally and deliberately replaced by exotics including pines. Being high, like several other peaks in the set, Franklin also has communications and fire spotting towers on the summit.

Mount Alexander, with its similarly rich First Nations connections, unlike its nearby, eponymous, incredibly rich gold diggings, was relatively fortunate to be spared the indignity of mining, only to be completely cleared of trees for fuel and mine timbering by the 1870s. Over the next century it was a dogged battle, initially between local farmers using it as a Common for grazing and timber removal, granite quarrying in at least eight sites, pine and other plantations, attempts by an 1870s women’s collective to create a sericultural (silk) industry, and later land managers attempting to encourage alienation, grazing or palm it off to other government agencies. More recently, the mountain has become a tourist destination for an ill fated koala park, bushwalking and rock climbing, with its highest point now bristling with communication and other towers.

Mount Tarrengower I plan to link by physical and historical association to the nearby Neereman Aboriginal Protectorate on the Loddon, a largely untold story of colonial folly which preceded the better known Protectorate story near Mount Franklin. Tarrengower I know less about, mainly because the land manager file in Epsom is only partial and recent. I’m planning on leveraging next off local and district long time friends and experts. Peter Skilbeck lives nearby at Joyces Creek and knows heaps from his summer fire spotter experiences on the summit for 26 years until 2022. I’ll also tap into the deep local knowledge of mining archaeologist and friend, David Bannear about the associated Tarrengower diggings. Similarly, Clive Willman, a friend and geologist knows lots about the mountain and its very ancient history. I do know the steep road up to the summit intimately, from riding to the top on a bicycle, but there is a lot more to learn, as for all the Peaks, from discovery on ground and on Country with local experts.

Mount Greenock is in the six peak set largely by virtue of its serendipitous history. Major Thomas Mitchell stood on and renamed the summit in 1836 as he waxed lyrical about his ‘discovery’ of a well managed Aboriginal grassland he took to be a biblical and unpeopled biblical Eden and called it ‘Australia Felix’. The volcanic mountain and breached crater straddles a once rich deep lead which was mined for gold into the 1900s, and later became a Town Common for Talbot and District. Fast forward to the present day Geological Reserve, appallingly managed largely in the vested interests of local cattle graziers. By virtue of all these associations, the evidence base about Greenock and the former township of Dunach on its flanks is relatively extensive.

Finally, Mount Beckworth whose distinctive lollypop tree (Aleppo Pine) in its summit tells its own story and tale of survival, on a weathered granitic range also subject over decades to licensed and unlicensed grazing, tree and woodland removal, wildfire and rabbits, extensive mining of its sand aprons, and numerous attempts at private alienation. In the process, bird observers and orchid lovers aware of the peak’s many other values resisted many of these incursions.

Originally renamed by Mitchell as he passed by, the Mount Beckworth peak and area also lost its original trees to service the nearby Clunes Goldfields mines and boilers from the 1850s. More recently, the mountain and particularly its relatively low granite cliffs and boulders have quietly become regionally important for rock climbers, walkers and picnickers. As with Tarregower, the available Crown files forMount Beckworth are relatively thin and recent. Thus much effort will go during February into finding local people in the Clunes area who know and love and enjoy the mountain and its former community and settlement of Glendaruel on its southern flanks.

My intention is to pen a second update in late February, just before I disappear, mostly ‘off the radar’ for a month until resuming work on the Fellowship from 27 March. First, I head to Tasmania with friends for an 85km, 8 day backpack walk along Tasmania’s remote south coast. This will be followed soon after by walking the 260km Great South West Walk in far western Victoria. It’s a symphony in four natural acts: the Cobboboonee forest behind Portland, the languid lower Glenelg River, the wild sandy beaches east of Nelson along Bridgwater Bay, and the rugged coast around several capes back into Portland.

Loddon Aboriginal Protectorate Legacy

Loddon Aboriginal Protectorate Legacy

Barry Golding

24 October 2022

These notes are in two parts. The first 2,000 words, headed ‘1840s Aboriginal Protectorate Walk Notes’ provide interpretive notes for walkers who register for the Great Dividing Trail Association’s (GDTA) Members or Public Walks around the Franklinford Township during November 2022. They will also be also useful for anyone embarking on the ‘1840s Aboriginal Protectorate’ self-guided Walk Number 11, pp.34-35, published in 2021 GDTA ‘Walk and Ride Circuits’ guide. Localities marked on the map in the Circuits guide (p.35) are shown in bold.

The second part headed ‘The Evidence Base: Loddon Aboriginal Protectorate History’ (8,000 words) includes the lesser known back story of the foundation of Neereman Aboriginal Protectorate on the Loddon River in 1840, which preceded its relocation to the Franklinford site by mid 1841, operating on its new site until Protectorates were abolished in late 1849.

As with all of my work, I look forward to critical comment, including telling me what I may have got wrong.

1840s Aboriginal Protectorate Walk Notes

Whilst the GDTA guided walks on November 12 & 13 in 2022 follow the marked 6.2 km route in this guide, the longer member’s walk route on 12 November adds a 5 km (approx.) extension incorporating access (with one off permission) across Eric and Joy Sartori’s private property, ‘Truro’ including along part of Larnibarramul yaluk (formerly Jim Crow Creek) with an historic weir from the 1930s. The interpretive notes for this additional loop beyond the Franklinford Cemetery (which cuts out the section along Ligar Street) follow the main notes.

Clarkes Pool on Larni barramul yaluk is a delightful and picturesque pool on a tight bend of a billabong in the creek within the Franklinford Streamside Reserve. It was formally surveyed in the 1990s as an important Aboriginal site. The late Frank Powell from Mount Franklin wrote in the late 1960s that this ‘billabong on Jim Crow Creek at Franklinford … was a known corroboree site’. There is a detailed account of an Aboriginal Corroboree held in Franklinford in November 1843 though its exact location is not specified.

The bitumen access road down to the Streamside Reserve is via Clarkes Road, which heads SW from the main Franklinford intersection until it veers south, becoming gravel as it crosses the top of the very tight meander, with steep drops to the creek on either side, before ending at a parking area beside the billabong pool under the ancient River Red Gums short of a disused road bridge. 

In summer, if the water is flowing gently this is a delightful, popular and safe place to picnic and swim. Platypus have been sighed in the pool. Clarke’s Pool has been featured as the backdrop to several videos produced by Hepburn Shire with the Dja Dja Wurrung traditional owners as part of the community consultation process leading to the creek’s formal renaming during 2022.

The first part of the walk leads back along Clarke’s Road. Franklin Ford, marked in the GDTA guide to the south of the gravel road, was the original crossing point on the creek for an 1840s road that originally led from the Protectorate station south west through the forest via a bridle track to John Hepburn’s run. The ford is visible as a basalt pavement in the creek off the road easement.

The walk route turns left into the Franklinford Cemetery along Cemetery Road. Immediately to the left there is a grassy track that leads down to Thomas’ Spring. The fact that this public freshwater spring runs all year round and fills the pool in even the driest seasons was one of several features which made the Franklinford site attractive as an alternative Protectorate site in 1841. You will notice the grey basalt rocks around the pool are stained with a white precipitate, indicative of high calcium carbonate levels in the water and some possible association with a mineral spring at depth. The pool is often fringed with the floating aquatic plant, Water Cress (Nasturtium officinale), one of the oldest known edible leaf vegetables native to Europe and Asia, with a distinctive piquant taste.

Cemetery Road cuts out at the Franklinford Cemetery. If you walk into the Cemetery along the paths between the old and more recent graves towards the back of the cemetery, you will come across a much older cemetery on a different alignment enclosed within the larger and more recently surveyed cemetery. The boundaries of the older rectangular Protectorate era cemetery (first surveyed in 1843, but where several burials took place earlier) are marked by a low ditch. The four corners of the older cemetery are marked with wrought iron corner posts and native trees, thoughtfully selected by the late local historian Edgar Morrison during the late 1970s and planted ‘by four visiting Aborigines’. The most prominent marked gravestones in this area commemorate Assistant Protector Edward Parker, his first wife Mary, his second wife Hannah, some of their children and their extended family. PRACTICAL NOTE: This picturesque and historic public cemetery is the only place along the walk route with a (basic) toilet.

The original cemetery records and the mostly wooden original grave markers were lost long ago in a bush fire. As a consequence, it is impossible to know how many people were buried here inclusive of the Aboriginal Protectorate, Aboriginal Station and Aboriginal School eras between 1841 and 1864. Given the hundreds of Aboriginal people and White who lived and died in the area during that interval, the actual number of unmarked burials in this historically significant site is likely to be large. Because the area has been fenced from stock and also regularly and lightly burnt, the cemetery area retains many significant volcanic grassland and woodland species otherwise missing in the surrounding privately owned and intensively grazed paddocks.

The self-guided walk route in the booklet heads back to Cemetery Road and up the grassy and largely disused Ligar Street, named after surveyor, soldier and grazier Charles Whybrow Ligar (1811-1881). Whybrow Street to the east is similarly ‘a nod ‘to Ligar, who became surveyor general in Victoria in 1858 following 15 years working as New Zealand surveyor general. At one time, Ligar and his family invested heavily in livestock. With partners, at one stage Ligar was lessee of three million acres (1,214,070 ha) in the Riverina.

If you to the south from the top of Ligar Street you will get a good view over the paddock south of Clarke’s Road (which includes the marked ‘Aboriginal School Site’. This paddock was the epicentre of the Franklinford Protectorate settlement for over two decades from 1841. If you look towards the southern horizon towards Wombat Hill above Daylesford, and the western horizon you will get some sense that the relatively fertile volcanic soils of the inner main Protectorate area set aside for cultivation (radius one mile) was then conveniently protected, surrounded and bounded (as now) on most sides of the five mile (8km) Protectorate radius by forested land on the older shales. This forested area then deemed  as ‘unsuitable for stations’ by Parker, was nominally preserved for Aboriginal hunting within the Protectorate.

TAKE CARE turning right into the relatively busy Hepburn-Newstead Road. For safety, walk well off the road edge before walking east along Stuart Street *** to the marked ‘Former Franklinford Store’ on the street corner, now a private house. Mary Parker’s sister, Charlotte, was in transit to Australia when Mary died. Charlotte stayed on and married Mr W. Bumstead, later operating the Franklinford Store. A Post Office operated in Franklinford for 110 years from 1859 to 1969.

Walk to the marked stone ‘Monument’ southeast of the intersection, acknowledging Edward Parker’s contribution to the Aboriginal Protectorate. An explanation from Edgar Morrison of the symbolism he built into the Parker Memorial Cairn (unveiled in 1965) incorporating carefully chosen rocks was published in Morrison’s Frontier Life (1967, p.v) booklet, as summarised below. 

The base of the monument incorporates rocks taken from an early settlers home, which Morrison took to symbolise ‘the sturdy endurance of the district pioneers’. The body of the cairn comprises ‘volcanic boulders from the site of the Aboriginal Station’ as well as some ‘dressed pumice which formed part of the chimney of Mr Parker’s later station homestead on the western slope of Mount Franklin’, embodying what Parker took to be ‘the influences of hearth and home and [Parker’s] devotion to aboriginal welfare and education’. 

Morrison symbolically incorporated stones of ‘special significance’ into the three sides of the cairn. To the south, are hand-made bricks in the form of a cross, symbolising Parker’s ‘spiritual aspirations’. On the west are stones from the old Tarrengower Station founded by Lauchlan McKinnon, frequently visited by Parker, perceived to symbolise Parker’s ‘cordial relationships with neighbouring settlers’. The eastern aspect incorporates a white quartz rock whose whiteness ‘may remind us of the high reputation’ which Morrison suggested Parker ‘earned in every situation’.

Behind the monument you will see a sign with ‘Larnebarramul: Home of the Emu’ supported by an axle erected by the late Edgar Morrison. This and several similar metal signs and markers we see on this walk were officially opened at a celebratory Field Day in 1968. First Nations people invited included Ivy Sampson, daughter of Thomas Dunolly (a former schoolboy at the Aboriginal School) and the late Pastor Doug Nichols.

Standing at the Monument intersection, if you were to take a ‘helicopter view’ you are at the centre of a township laid out in the shape of a Union Jack. Early survey maps of Franklinford township included not only the main existing cross roads which run on the diagonals, but also a network of back streets running east-west and north-south, bounded by South, East and North Streets. Many of these named suburban streets, some lined by stone fences, are now disused or incorporated into surrounding properties.

The marked walk includes a ‘dog leg’, SE down (and back) Powell Connection Road towards the ‘Seat Under Pines’ opposite Larnebarramul Lagoon. This is a busy road: walk well off the road with care. In the 1840s this was the main road to Melbourne to the north of Mount Franklin via present day Glenlyon.

On the south side of Powell Connection Road, look out for a metal sign erected to mark where Edgar Morrison believed the Aboriginal Protectorate Station buildings were located. David Rhodes’ 1997 survey and report confirms that while the sign overlooks the actual site below in the far distance, it does not mark the site itself. If you look over the forest to the west, in the distance you will see the outline of the now bald Mount Kooroocheang.

The paddock that includes the lagoon opposite the roadside seat is private property. Do not enter the paddock. The late Frank Powell noted that what he called ‘Strawhorn Lagoon’ in 1967 was a ‘known corroboree site’. David Rhodes’ survey identified and recorded several significant pre- and post-contact Aboriginal sites around this lagoon. Several of the huge Red Gum trees nearby include evidence of ancient strap grafting preserved in their upper branches, as well as pre- and pos- contact habitation spaces within their burnt out trunks.

Walk back along the side of Powell Connection Road, then walk down a steep minor road that trends west before the marked ‘Former Church’, then head south with care along the side of busy Hepburn Newstead Road, turning right (west) along South Street to the marked ‘Aboriginal School Site’. The sign including the outline of a symbolic school bell reads ‘Aboriginal School Site 1849/1864’. The paddock behind the sign is where most of the original Protectorate buildings were clustered including what became the Aboriginal School. The foundations on main site and school approximates a clump of ancient Robinia (Black Locust) trees approximately 100 metres inside the paddock. Do not enter the paddock.

Additional GDTA Member’s Walk Notes (NB: private property, no entry without permission)

Beyond the Franklinford Cemetery on the GDTA members walk on 12 Nov 2022 (see notes above ***), we walk west following a disused (and sometimes boggy) gated laneway across private grazing property. The laneway is lined in places by collapsing historic stone walls. This was one of the early, once busy goldfields-era roads which would have provided access to and beyond Larni barramul yaluk to the German Gully goldfields to the south west and on through the bush to Kooroocheang.

At the creek we turn north along the east bank, initially following a combination of cattle tracks and goldfields era water races. After a few hundred metres we come to a still intact Weir across the creek. The weir and an associated large channel heading north along the eastern bank were constructed with Sustenance (‘Susso’) labour during the 1930s Depression, taking water all the way north to Newstead. The water system was abandoned by 1980s.

Heading north we pass an outcrop of columnar basalt. The vertical columns run perpendicular to the upper and bottom horizontal cooling surfaces, formed by shrinkage as the basalt flow slowly cooled. Nearby are the eroding mullock heap of a deep lead mine, which originally included tunnels that would have tapped into the gold bearing gravels beneath the basalt flow.

The farm road leaves the creek and heads east up the hill past Eric and Joy Sartori’s orchard and farmhouse along a steep gravel road. Please respect their privacy. As you walk up the hill you get excellent views back down the creek valley. From the top of the hill several peaks come into view including nearby Larnebarramul / Mount Franklin to the east, and in the distance to the north, Tarrengower and Leanganook / Mount Alexander.

Where Sartori Road meets the marked, busy, bitumen Hepburn – Newstead Road, turn right and walk safely on the roadside, NOT going south down marked Ligar Street as in the GDTA booklet, but rejoining the marked walk, interpreted by the notes, above ***, by heading east along Stuart Street.

———————————————

The Evidence Base: Loddon Aboriginal Protectorate History

The history of first contact in southern Dja Dja Wurrung Country has traditionally tended to focus either on a heroic narrative about a small number of White male ‘explorers’ and squatters conquering and ‘settling’ a hostile environment, or the frenetic pace of change during the many gold rushes from the 1850s. 

This account of what happened before 1850 is more unsettling. It focuses on a government intervention that sought to coerce and remove First Nations peoples from Country in the Port Philip Colony during the 1840s and concentrate them in small ‘Aboriginal Protectorates’ for their own safety. The plan was to create four Aboriginal enclaves five miles in radius, not only for Aboriginal peoples’ own protection away from widespread squatter violence, but also as a way of expediting the White ‘settlement’ process.

Unbeknown to many present day residents, present day Neereman (north of Baringhup, in the Mount Alexander Shire) and Franklinford (north of Daylesford, in the Hepburn Shire) were epicentres of an Aboriginal Protectorate ostensibly designed to cover what is now north western Victoria during the 1840s,then defined as ‘the Mount Macedon area and country northwards’.

What follows relies heavily on candid accounts from the personal diaries of the ‘Chief Protector’ George Augustus Robinson, as well from ‘Assistant Protector’ Edward Stone Parker, who was responsible for the establishment of Protectorates on both sites. It is supplemented by other information from Edgar Morrison’s three booklets, David Rhodes’ 1995 on ground historical and archaeological investigation, supplemented by original Protectorate records. 

In brief, Parker initially set up his Protectorate at Neura Mong (literally ‘hide here’ in Dja Dja Wurrung language, today’s Neereman) on the Loddon River 6 km north of Baringhup in October 1840. He relocated it to the better known Protectorate west of Mount Franklin on Larnibarramul yaluk (previously known as ‘Jim Crow Creek’) in June 1841.

This section focuses mainly on the evidence and back stories behind Parker’s establishment of both the initial Neura Mong / Loddon Aboriginal Protectorate and the relocated Mount Franklin Protectorate that operated in the area within a 5 mile (8km) radius circle of present day Franklinford from June 1841 to the end of 1849. 

This account includes only brief mention of the later temporary Aboriginal Reserve, the Mount Franklin Aboriginal Station of 640 acres established at the foot of Mount Franklin in 1852 where Edward Parker acted as a Guardian of Aborigines, built a house and where several Aboriginal people farmed. In 1864 the Aboriginal School operating on the former Protectorate site at Franklinford was closed and the remaining Aboriginal people living on the Station were removed to the Aboriginal Station at Coranderrk near Healesville. When it also in closed in 1924, many Dja Dja Wurrung descendants were moved on to Lake Tyers Mission.

The Back Story of the Aboriginal Protectorate System

Turning the clock back to 1837, a British Committee of Inquiry into the Condition of Aboriginal Peoples set up in the wake of the previous shameful treatment of and armed resistance from First Nations peoples in Van Diemen’s Land, recommended a Protectorate System be attempted in mainland Australia, confined initially to the Port Philip District. The system was premised on the refusal of the British Government to recognise prior ownership of Australia by First Nations peoples.

Four Assistant Protectors were recruited from England and appointed in December 1837. None had been to Australia before, all had previously been schoolmasters and none had ever met Aboriginal people. Edward Parker had been earlier been apprenticed as a printer, then had to give up candidacy as a Methodist Minister when he violated the condition for ministerial candidates by marrying. The Assistant Protectors arrived in Sydney in August 1838, but because of administrative delays did not reach Melbourne until 3 January 1839. For the first few weeks they were camping in tents with their families (including their wives and a total of 22 children) on the Yarra River a mile out of Melbourne with no definite instructions. 

On 27 Feb 1839 they met the Chief Protector, George Augustus Robinson, appointed on the basis of his ‘success’, previously employed to cajole, deceive, remove and concentrate most First Nations Tasmanians to Flinders Island during the 1830s. Robinson appears, from his frank and critical diary entries, to have been instantly underwhelmed by and intolerant of the four men that were to be in his charge. His particular and ongoing dislike of Assistant Protector Edward Parker, who by March 1839 had been allocated to ‘the area around Mount Macedon … and the country to the northward and eastward’, saturates many of the accounts cited in this account taken from Robinson’s personal diaries.

For context, by March 1839, John Hepburn and family had been on southern Dja Dja Wurrung country for almost a year and had established a sheep station at the foot of Mount Kooroocheang to the west of the Larni barramul (‘home of the emu’) crater, today’s Mount Franklin. Mollison was by then firmly established in the Kyneton area and Ebden was at Carlsruhe north of Woodend. Many other ‘unsettlers’ had come overland from Sydney following Major Mitchell’s 1836 ‘Line’. By 1839 they had ‘taken up’ (forcefully and violently seized) much of southern Dja Dja Wurrung Country, and other squatters had pushed north through Wadawurrung Country over the Great Dividing Range into some of the most fertile and densely settled inland First Nations estates in Australia.

Understandably, there was resistance to forced removal from Country by the traditional owners in the process of setting up ‘runs’, including by John Hepburn on the Smeaton Hill run. George Robinson first mentions ‘Captain Hepburn’ in his diary whilst in Melbourne on 15 March 1839, writing that Reverend Gill, the first Anglican Minister in Melbourne, had told him that Hepburn said that ‘… the blacks had frequently attacked his station, generally in his absence. Said the natives had guns with them’. By the time Robinson first met John Hepburn in Melbourne six months later, Robinson recorded Hepburn saying (on 25 September 1839) that ‘… the blacks are very numerous in his neighbourhood. They had killed his sheep and all but strangled a shepherd. Believes they were Port Phillip natives. … Said the native women and children fled to his station for protection.’ In the same diary entry, Robinson writes that Hepburn also mentioned that the ‘Names of settlers beside him were Pettit [W. H. Petit managing ‘Dowling Forest’ run north of Ballarat for W. J. T. Clarke], Coggle (sic.) [the Coghill Brothers at ‘Glendonald’ run near Clunes], and Birch [on the ‘Seven Hills’ run near present day Kingston]’.

In 1839, the government instructions as to how the Aboriginal Protectorate system might work in practice were rather vague. Given the extent to which the best country had been so quickly carved up for sheep stations by this time, Edward Parker’s prospect of selecting a Protectorate site which ticked all the boxes was almost impossible. Robinson suggested that the four Assistant Protectors should do what he had done in Tasmania during the 1830s, and begin to move with the Aboriginal groups in order to learn their languages and culture, in the process devising the best means of civilising and protecting them. By March 1839, this suggestion had become a direction from Robinson.

All four Assistant Protectors were ill equipped, with very limited resources, support or budgets and were understandably reluctant to move far away from Melbourne, each with wives and large families. In Parker’s case, his wife Mary already had six children and was pregnant with their seventh. By mid 1839 Parker had begun to comprehend the impossibility of his task in the face of concerted pastoralist and press opposition to the Protectorate idea. As the failure to prosecute those responsible for the murder of 28 unarmed Aboriginal men, women and children in the infamous Myall Creek Massacre (near present day Bingara in northern NSW) in June 1838 had shown, the Aborigines then had no rights to give evidence in court and the many well documented cases of pastoralist murders of Aboriginal people pursued by the Assistant Protectors were unable to be prosecuted.

To make matters worse, by the late 1830s, desperate and starving Aboriginal people on the pastoral frontier in the Port Phillip District had most contact with convict shepherds and hutkeepers in the virtual absence of police or of the rule of law. Many were moving desperately between the early settlements that had taken their most productive land and food resources, now grazed by sheep. Some had resorted to coming to town, particularly Melbourne, some involved in begging, prostitution and the use of force against the invaders.

It was Parker who believed that the Assistant Protectors needed some inducement to encourage Aborigines to be concentrated on the proposed Protectorate Stations, in the form of clothing, food and shelter, quite apart from the medals and trinkets which Robinson often employed. Like Robinson and the other Assistant Protectors, Parker also fervently believed that his responsibilities included civilising Aboriginal people and that this was best achieved by Christianising them.

By September 1839 Parker and his family had moved out of the small town of Melbourne but only as far as Jacksons Creek near Sunbury. Not far from the current Emu Bottom’ property, he erected a wattle and daub hut for his family. Parker’s request that the Protectors be allowed to form Protectorate Stations was finally approved by Governor Gipps in April 1840. The idea was to have an inner reserve of one square mile for cultivation, and an outer reserve with a five-mile radius for hunting and gathering. This proposal meant that 25 large and diverse Aboriginal Nations and peoples in the Port Phillip District, including the Dja Dja Wurrung, were to be concentrated into four arbitrary areas comprising a total of only 200 square kilometres, representing only 0.08 per cent of the land area of Victoria. In modern terms it might have been called a concentration or refugee camp.

Whilst the four Assistant Protectors had been awaiting Gipps’ approval to form Protectorate Stations, they undertook reconnaissance for where the four Protectorate stations should actually be located. With this task in mind, Robinson travelled extensively including to ‘the Loddon District’ with Parker between 9 January and 11 March 1840. Robinson’s extensive diary records whilst in southern Dja Dja Wurrung country on this reconnaissance trip with Edward Parker provide one of the best first hand, written records of many aspects of the southern Dja Dja Wurrung Country and people in the landscape at that time. Gary Presland’s timely self-published book, ‘Riding with Robinson’ (2022), provides a detailed, annotated account of Robinson’s personal diaries during this trip.

Robinson’s diary entries relating to this reconnaissance indicate that Robinson and Parker’s journey approximated the current Western Highway through the Pentland Hills between Melbourne and Ballan, then diverging west to travel in an arc close to present day Mount Edgerton, Scotsburn, Buninyong, Yuile’s Swamp (Lake Wendouree) and Mount Hollowback (which they climbed). At this point they were on the edge of southerd Dja Dja Wurrung country. Thence, on 13 February 1840 they passed through ‘fine open downs’ surrounded by ‘numerous ball topped hills crowned with grass and below grassy plains and open forest, passing Pettit’s [Dowling Forest] and Birch’s ‘comfortable house’ [near present day Kingston] before arriving at John Hepburn’s Smeaton Hill station.

The initial Protectorate site at Neereman 1840-41

One of the main reasons for Robinson and Parker’s eight week trip was to identify a site for Parker’s Protectorate station. Climbing in 14 February 1840 to the top of Mount Kooroocheang just behind Hepburn’s station gave them a splendid view. According to Robinson, John Hepburn: ‘Pointed out the [proposed] place for Parker’s station distant 9 miles NE by N. on the Major’s Line and where he encamped.’ This would have placed it on the Loddon River in the vicinity of present day Newstead.

Robinson continued:

There are large water holes here and plenty of fish, and kangaroos in abundance. And its (sic.) on the border. Nor will it be required. Hence a better site for an establishment could not be selected for the district. It is accessible from Melbourne, 90 miles by the road through the ranges, and could easily be found, being on the Major’s Line. There is a hill Mr Hepburn calls Salus [Mount Tarrengower] N and E to the right of Major’s Line. It’s a good object for travellers. Also a hill Mr Hepburn calls Jem Crow [Mount Franklin] because of the numerous small hollows around it.

The next day Robinson had clearly talked about their options with Hepburn and Parker, noting that Hepburn had offered every assistance in showing him the way over the ranges to the proposed Protectorate site, shortening the route from the 120 miles via Geelong to 80 miles via Mollison’s (near Malmsbury) and Mount Alexander. By then Hepburn had also identified a shorter road from his station to Steiglitz’s (today in the Ballan area) on an ‘almost level road’ impeded only by large fallen timber. This route described was likely past the current Clarke’s Hill and south through the former Bullarook Forest, now prime potato country on the well-watered Great Dividing Range.

On 20 February 1840 Robinson and Parker headed north from Hepburn’s station at the foot of Kooroocheang towards the Loddon River, by following what is now known as Joyces Creek. Robinson wrote that day in his diary that:

This is certainly a good situation for the head station of the Macedon district. It is guarded from the encroachment of squatters, provided the government do not assign them any country, and is accessible at all points. The Major’s Line runs through the centre and it is open at the N and S end and can be approached by the natives without interference. Its length, extreme, is four miles and average breadth one mile. The two ponds are nearly united; by opening up the reeds course of the [Loddon] river runs through. The average length of these ponds is 400 yards, breadth 100 feet. The natives have made Mitchell’s highroad their road. Their track is well beaten upon it.

In reality it was the other way around. Mitchell had been following a well-trodden, ancient Dja Dja Wurrung highways through intensively managed  aboriginal grasslands and along the rich Polodyul / Loddon River Valley. On their reconnaissance expedition along present day Joyces Creek, Robinson (on 20 Feb 1840) was at first ‘at a loss to account for the wheel [tracks] and immense number of cattle tracks we now met with’. Later he realised they had crossed Mitchell’s now well-worn ‘Line’. The ‘encroachment of squatters’ alluded to above was already well underway.

Parker returned on 12 March 1840 to his home base near Sunbury, after this tour of reconnaissance with Robinson. This tour ‘into the interior’ of his allocated north west area led Parker to write to Robinson on 18 March 1840 that ‘I wish to station myself and family immediately in a central situation about the Loddon River’, seeking permission ‘to occupy a suitable tract of country in the situation I have indicated’

Parker’s rough sketch shows an extensive area between the Pyrenees (‘Pilawin’) to the west, and Mount Macedon (‘Terrawait’) to the east, bounded on the south by ‘Bunninyong’, ‘Warrneip’ (Mount Warrenheip)andMurniyong (Mount Blackwood) and to the north by the granite range comprising Leanganook (Mount Alexander) and Mount Byngh (Mount Tarrengower). By that time in March 1840, there were already nine named squatters marked on his map north of the Great Dividing Range. Elmes, Lynot, Coghill and Hepburn were towards the west, and Ebden, Mollison, Thornloe, Monro and Hutton were towards the west. 

The forested country now comprising the then conjoined Creswick, Wombat Upper Loddon and Lerderderg forests plus the then ‘Bullarook Forest’ on the Great Divide around Dean and Mollongghip were marked as ‘Broken Forest Country unavailable for stations’. Parker’s map suggests that the Loddon River valley north of the forest between Mollison and Hepburn’s stations in the vicinity of what is marked as ‘Mitchell’s Line’ had in March 1840 apparently not been taken up. It was this area that Parker set out to return to and examine more closely in mid 1840.

Edgar Morrison (1966, p.16) cites Parker writing (no date given) that he had narrowed down his choice ‘to a particular section of the river in the vicinity of the hill called by the natives Tarrengower’, where he had found a site ‘which seemed to be particularly eligible for the aboriginal establishment’. Parker was clear about his motives and asserted Aboriginal rights not otherwise established until the Mabo decision over 150 years later in 1992. He noted in 1840 that: ‘I deem it my duty respectfully but firmly to assert the right of Aborigines to the soil and its indigenous productions, until suitable compensation be made for occupation by reserving and cultivating a sufficient portion for their maintenance’.

The Neereman Protectorate site on the Loddon River actually chosen by Parker had, unbeknown to Parker, recently been occupied by squatters Dutton, Darlot and Simson, who challenged its establishment. Despite strident public opposition for the Protectorate’s establishment during 1840, aired in the pages of the Port Phillip Herald (which was co-owned by Dutton), by February 1840 twelve Aboriginal dwellings had been built at Neereman. Parker returned to Melbourne from Nerreman on Christmas Eve, 1840 and arrived at Robinson’s office on Christmas Day, 25 Dec. By then Parker had compiled a list of hundreds of named individuals in twelve Dja Dja Wurrung clans, then called ‘Jajowrong sections’ also listed in Robinson’s 25 December diary. The number of people in each clan was also estimated, ranging from ‘about 50’ Galgalbulluk to ‘only two survive’ of the Wonangabulluk.

Aside from the squatter resistance, the less than ideal sandy site and the poor timing of its establishment in a hot summer of an extremely dry year had by then become obvious. The many problems Parker faced during this period are comprehensively covered in Bain Attwood’s The Good Country (pp.100-101). By 5 January 1841 Parker was writing to Robinson seeking permission to relocate the North West Protectorate site. By then an inspection of the Neereman site by overseer, Robert Bazeley , confirmed that the cultivation proposed as part of the civilizing and Christianising project at the Neereman site was not feasible. Bazeley identified a preferred alternative site ‘about three miles above the point where Major Mitchell’s Line crosses the Loddon’. Edgar Morrison in 1966 concluded that this would have placed it ‘on the river flats in the vicinity of the Strangways Railway siding’. However Lachlan McKinnon, then owner of the nearby Tarrangower run wrote on 7 Jan 1841 to Governor La Trobe strongly objecting also to the Strangways site.

As an aside, overseer Bazeley’s daughter died at the Franklinford Protectorate site in June 1842. Being one of the first recorded white settler deaths she was buried, in Parker’s words (cited in Morrison, 1971, p.43) at a ‘suitable place for a burial ground’. This burial preceded the formal survey of the Franklinford Protectorate Cemetery by approximately 18 months, likely on the same site, as Parker’s first wife, Mary was later buried there in October 1842.

Parker called on Robinson in Melbourne several times in early January 1841. On 14 January 1841, Robinson wrote that ‘Mr Parker called p.m., brought a letter explanatory in reference to his proceedings in reference to the native locality on the Loddon River’. However from early February to mid-August 1841, Robinson was distracted by his insatiable travel bug and conveniently distracted from the impossible task of managing all four Associate Protectors. From 4 Feb to 23 Feb Robinson was away on a tour to the Ovens River district. From 21 March to 14 August Robinson 1841 was on tour again, this time undertaking reconnaissance for the southwestern district Protectorate station briefly based at Mount Rouse. By the time Robinson returned, the Protectorate had already been relocated.

The move to Larnenebarramul in 1841

Robinson first visited Parker’s new station site centred on present day Franklinford on 19 Nov 1841, that he described as being:

… on one of the sources of the Lodden (sic.), at a place called Willam.be.par.re.mal [‘place of the emu’], a short distance from Lal.gam.book. The appearance of the place on approaching is rather pleasing; it is however surrounded by broken forest ranges containing abundance of game.

Robinson observed that Mrs Parker was ‘in general dirty’ in appearance, and he ‘first rode around the station to give Mrs Parker an opportunity of cleaning’. Robinson stayed there only one night, sleeping in Parker’s office but did not actually meet Edward Parker. Robinson also reported that ‘few natives’ were present, before heading off instead towards Le Soeuf’s Protectorate Station on the Goulburn River via Mollison’s station, close to present day Malmsbury (where he did finally meet Mr Parker).

Robinson’s explanation for the absence of ‘blacks’ at the Franklinford Protectorate, was that the day he had arrived, ‘… the blacks went off to the north for more blacks’. The next day, 20 November 1841 he suggested another explanation, when he wrote that ‘Nearly all the natives were leaving the station. The natives say too much sick[ness] at the station at Willam.be.parramul’, that he later (23 Nov) calls ‘Jem Crow Hill’. That day Robinson included a tally of the fluctuating number of Aborigines at the station between 8-19 November, from a peak of 79 men to a low of 29 men when he arrived. On 9 November 1841 there were 132 Aboriginal people present: 60 men, 24 women, 30 boys and 18 girls.

Robinson noted that ‘The Aboriginal station here commenced June 1841’ and listed all of the buildings, paddocks and crops. The buildings included Parker’s four-room slab house and the overseer’s split slab, two room hut. Robinson, in his typically critical fashion, also painted a fairly grim but perhaps honest scene in his personal diary on 20 Nov 1841. Such scenes were deliberately missing from the gilded descriptions both Robinson and Parker provided which were incorporated into government reports of the time.

I saw no signs of a school. … The natives much diseased. … It may be considered an establishment for prostitution. … Natives described how poor men, i.e. settler’s servants drove them away when their masters come. The hill at Loddon station is called Wil.lam.be.par.ra.mal (emu house). The creek or branch of the Lodden is called Lulgambook.

Robinson noted in his diary two months later, on 20 January 1842, on his way to what he described in detail and referred to as a distressing and tragic hanging of two condemned Aboriginal (Tasmanian) men, that on the previous day in Melbourne, he gave ‘Mr Parker medals for the Lodden station and appointed Boardman to his station’. Boardman was employed as a carpenter.

There were many goon reasons why being taught discipline and punctuality and voluntarily tilling the soil alongside paid White overseers, bullock drivers and farm hands on Protectorate Stations was never going to work, aside from the First Nations need to fulfil ongoing obligations to Nation, Clan, family and Country. The main ‘carrot’ to come to the Protectorate and stay was the provision of food and medical help, which by then was desperately needed. By late 1841 Parker estimated that 90 per cent of Dja Dja Wurrung people in his Larnibarramul census were debilitated by syphilis. A more complete account of the many reasons why the Protectorate also failed on this new site is found in Bain Attwood’s The Good Country, Chapter 6.

Momentous family pressures during these first five years also began to surface publicly for the Parker family. Mary Parker had spent almost five years raising a large family on the frontier swelled by many apparently ‘orphaned’ children they had ‘taken in’, much of the time whilst her husband, Edward was absent for long periods. On 2 Sept 1842 Robinson wrote in his diary that Assistant Protector Dredge had made an affidavit that he saw Assistant Protector Sievwright kiss Mrs Parker (Edward Parker’s wife) and had gone ‘into her cabin at all hours of the night’. Parker arrived in Melbourne on 24 Sept 1842, meeting with Robinson on 26 Sept to provide Robinson with another shocking revelation. Robinson in his diary of 29 Sept 1842 wrote that Parker had told him ‘that they saw Sievwright, fastened the tent and have connection with [Sievwright’s] daughter that the latter struggled but that he effected his purpose.’ In effect Parker was alleging Seivwright had committed incest.

Evidence from other sources confirms that colonial authorities and squatters already had a hatred of Sievwright because of his dogged attempts to try and bring the many murderers of Aborigines in the western district that he was responsible for to justice. They then judged him to be ‘of dubious moral character’ with claims [alluded to above that] he had committed adultery with a fellow Assistant Protector’s wife, and most serious of all, that he had committed incest with his 16 year old, eldest daughter, which promptly ended Sievwright’s commission.

It is highly pertinent to note here that Parker’s first wife, Mary, died tragically and ‘unexpectedly’ (age 35 years) less than a fortnight after the last of these diary records of Robinson which mention this conversation with Edward Parker on 11 October 1842. What happened and what was said in the Parker household in that fortnight can only be guessed at. Morrison suggested in Early days in the Loddon Valley (1966, p.64) that Mrs Parker’s life in the previous four years before her suicide had:

… been one of privation, hardship and solitude. So acute was her feeling of loneliness, occasioned by her husband’s frequent and prolonged absences on official duties, and by the dearth of female friends and companions, that she pleaded with her younger sister Charlotte to join her [which she did, but arrived after Mary Parker’s death].

Edward Parker was away in Melbourne the night his wife, Mary died at the Franklinford Protectorate site. The six young Parker boys were then in the household, age between six and 14 years, had actually been in the home at the time and were left without a mother. One of Parker’s children, writing years later recalled, ‘a distressing noise in mother’s room’ at ‘the midnight hour’ the evening she died. 

A young convict at the station, a constant companion of Parker’s on many of his expeditions, volunteered to ride the 80 miles (130 km) to Melbourne in the dark to fetch Parker, which he did on a series of horses in only six hours. Remarkably, he was back at the station by 9pm the next evening with Parker, despite taking two hours to finally locate him once he got to Melbourne.

Robinson next visited the Loddon Aboriginal Station for a few days in late November 1842. When he arrived on 26 Nov 1842, Robinson was unusually upbeat, recording:

Natives present 47 men, 33 women, 41 youths and boys, 22 girls, total 143. But as they kept coming in I should suppose there were 200. There was a good church and school and much fencing done since I was there last [almost exactly one year before]. Crops looked well. Gave the natives a treat. The Ma.le.conedeets [literally ‘men of the Mallee country’] were there.

As an aside, a detailed and independent 1883 recollection of a corroboree that included the visitors from the Mallee appeared in the Daylesford Advocate, held in ‘a camp … close to the station’, recalled as involving 300 participants in November 1843. 

In late November 1942 Robinson write that he ‘gave [the natives] a blanket to two chiefs and a meddal (sic) each’. On 27 Nov Robinson noted that:

All the natives and whites attended [church] service a.m. and were very attentive. Mr Parker spoke to them, part in native dialect and part English. I also addressed them … Mr Parker had service to persons in his own house and prayers morning and evening.’

On the day before he headed back to Melbourne, Robinson wrote on 28 November 1842 that he:

… visited the crater at the mount called Willum-parramul, otherwise Jem Crow. It is an ancient crater of large dimension. … Had a fine view. This morning visited the spring at the establishment a mile and a half distant [presumably the ‘Old Mill Stream’ towards Shepherds Flat]. In the evening attended corrobery (sic) of Malle condeets … At the conclusion both men and women singing together … After viewing … I went to the house. The Jajowrong had remained to a late hour.

In early 1843 Parker filed a Loddon Protectorate census dated 5 January 1843 of Jajowrong (Dja Dja Wurrung) Tribal Groups by clan. Twelve clans were listed with a total of 251 people, including 53 Galgalbulluk people and 37 Wornarra-gerrar people. By then, some clans listed had only two or three living individuals.

On an extended trip between 18 March and 29 April 1843 to the north east, northwest and Western Districts, Robinson again explored parts of the northern Dja Dja Wurrung country including parts of the northern Loddon River, along parts of Mitchell’s ‘northern’ Line. On his way back from this six week trip via the western district in late April, Robinson again entered southern Dja Dja Wurrung country. On 24 April Robinson makes mention of passing the cattle station at Mount Misery, lunching at McCallum’s station at Mount Greenock (where Campbell was visiting), being ‘well entertained’ at ‘Cameron’s out station 10 miles west of Hepburn’. The next day, 25 April 1843, Robinson wrote that he:

… proceeded to Hepburn [at Kooroocheang] and then to Wilam.e.parramul, over the range and by a bridle path. Natives at the station. Men 59, Women 46, Boys 35, Girls 28, [Total] 168. A large barn completed and 800 bushels wheat. … Mr Parker is building a pisa [pise: rammed earth] house.

On 26 April 1843 Robinson wrote ‘No school at Parkers’, before leaving the next day for Melbourne.

There is evidence here and elsewhere that by this time in 1843, despite Robinson’s optimistic report, the Protectorate system generally was in disarray: hampered by colonial bureaucracy, a legal system which gave Indigenous people minimal legal rights and hostility from both squatters and Aborigines. It was, in part, Parker’s favourable reports on the Loddon River Protectorate Station in 1843 (and later in 1845), which saved the Protectorate system, at least until a NSW Parliamentary Select Committee recommended it be abolished in 1849.

Parker next visited Robinson in Melbourne on both 6 and 8 June 1843. From June 1843 Parker was also given ‘surveillance’ responsibility for the Goulburn (NE) District of the Protectorate. Parker was still in Melbourne visiting Governor La Trobe on 26 June in a dispute about Le Soeuf’s bullocks at the Goulburn station, irritating Robinson because he thought Parker had already returned to his station. 

On 1 Nov 1843 Robinson again visited the Loddon station on the way back from the Goulburn. ‘Powlet and Hunter’ were at the station and not all was in order. Robinson records that:

One black prisoner Buckly (sic.) stealing sheep all the natives absent. A little boy present. Mt Parker’s natives out marauding in Pyrenees. Mr Parker 30 pigs … a little fencing done, barn unfinished. Plenty wheat left, Carpenter not wanted. … Slab building unsightly. Four white prisoners with Powlet (sic.) are women.

Robinson headed west, staying with the Hepburn family on 7 Nov 1843, noting he had seen ‘a Mill at Bitches [Birch’s]’, presumably Hepburn’s flour mill then powered by water from Hepburn Lagoon on Birch’s Creek.

As an aside here, it is pertinent to note that a few weeks after this diary entry by Robinson, Edward Parker remarried in Melbourne on 27 Dec 1843. His second wife was Hannah Edwards. Hannah had previously been employed as a seamstress on the Aboriginal station. When they married, Edward Parker was 41, and Hannah was 25. They went on to have six more children, three boys and three girls, but two of their daughters died in infancy. Their youngest son, George Alfred Parker, was born in 1858.

By Nov 1844 Robinson was facing calls to do away with the Goulburn station, noting that there were reports via Governor La Trobe of no natives being there or at the Loddon station. During 1845 the NSW Legislative Council appointed a select committee to assess the Protectorate system which heard highly critical accounts from its witnesses, but did not publish what would likely have been a damning report, as its Chairman died and it ceased its work. Increasingly, flocks from neighbouring pastoralists had impinged on the poorly defined and unfenced Protectorate boundaries, and Parker’s priorities progressively shifted towards advancing his own interests.

Robinson next visited the station at Franklinford for a week from 21-28 March 1845, this time travelling via Mollison’s outstation and Kangaroo Hills. Whilst he found ‘Parker at home’, Robinson wrote: ‘Few natives, Establishment an unsightly appearance’. Robinson attended a Sunday service in the chapel, noting on Monday 24 March that ‘Mr and Mrs Edwards [Hannah Parker’s parents] at Parker’s’. On 25 March two drays came to station, carrier from ‘Moone Ponds’ (sic.). Robinson left the Loddon Protectorate station on 28 March 1845 ’accompanied by Dr Campbell and Native Police’, staying overnight with John Hepburn’s family that night and with McCallum at Mount Greenock the next night on his way north.

It seems Robinson next visited the Protectorate in mid-November 1845. Arriving before sundown, Robinson wrote: ‘Mr Parker there. Ellen Edwards, Bricknell. Mrs Parker’s family away. Some fine natives’, on 13 Nov also noting Parker’s census for that day: there were 30 men, 31 women, 15 boys, 12 girls, total 88 at the Protectorate.

Robinson became bored with the Protectorate administrivia and life in Melbourne as the Protectorates slowly disintegrated. He went on a long and totally unauthorised grand tour between 26 March 1846 and 8 Aug 1846, which included parts of South Australia, stopping off briefly on the way at the Loddon Protectorate. Robinson wrote on 29 March 1846 that ‘Mr Parker at home, unwell, had intended to go to Goulburn, said got to me with 30 blacks, station dilapidated.’ Robinson stayed at the Franklinford Protectorate for almost two weeks but recorded less than two pages of diary in total, with some unusually brief, single sentence entries. Clearly, he had totally lost his interest in the inevitable decline of the Protectorates and was anxious to get away.

In that fortnight, some of very few highlights he wrote in his diary as he impatiently waited to move on included: ‘Mr Birch called’ (3 April 1846), ’Forty natives on station when I arrived. Forbes writing against Protectorate in March newspaper’ (4 April), ‘attended morning and evening service. Building and fences all dilapidated’ (Sunday, 5 April), ‘I am anxious to go already, all ready’ (6 April), On 7 April ‘Mr Coghil (sic.), Miss Hepburn, Thom and Mr [blank] teacher’, played ‘Blind Man’s Bluff’ in the evening, dismissing Edward Parker as ‘an old worrier’. Of all the scenes which epitomise this pitiful colonial scene and which I would like to be ‘fly on the wall’ for, Robinson being totally bored enough to play Blind Man’s Bluff with Edward Parker’s family and John Hepburn’s young daughter and the Protectorate teacher as the decaying and dilapidated Protectorate system unravels around them just five years after it was established at Franklinford sits right up there.

On 9 April 1846 Robinson wrote ‘Parker going home, is in a fright about going, quite alarmed’. Presumably Robinson had pressured Parker into coming along for Robinson’s intended and extended junket, a pressure that Parker had come to detest and understandably resist. The evening before Robinson left the Protectorate and headed further north into Dja Dja Wurrung country, Robinson bitterly recorded that that ‘Parker never came, a liar’.

On his return from his 18 week interstate ‘tour’, Robinson was chastised by Governor La Trobe and ordered not to travel away again, other than to the Port Phillip Protectorates. On 10 August 1846 Robinson was again railing in his diary, that Mr Parker ‘wants to take stock on terms I won’t listen to … I seen what it will result in. The mission is all a farce’. Parker visited Robinson in Melbourne next on 16 Oct 1846 and again on 18 Dec 1846. Robinson was losing patience with Parker, who claimed he had come to town and lost his horse:

Fudge! [‘Rubbish!’] As usual he was full of complaints, would not attend to much, had two stations to manage &c. and has work to do. Saved government this and that advanced moneys … yet cannot carry on impossible.’ 

Robinson went on to suggest that his own interstate jaunt had cost the government very little compared to what resources Parker had wasted.

When Robinson next visited Parker at his Mount Franklin station, again for just a few days between 21-24 Sept 1847, it was a very mixed report. He wrote during that interval that there were:

30 natives on station … expecting Mr La Trobe. Mr Parker at Goulburn last [between 15-19 Jan 1847]. Wheat sown, Footrot in sheep … [flour] mill out of order and wheat sent to Hepburn’s to grind. … 2,560 sheep Lodden (sic.), Parker got 1,1000 sheep with Bicknell on the station. Miserable place … orphan children. Parker plenty pig, geese and cattle … Parker sells stone instead of lime. Parker to account for money for lime …. The first Presbyterian church at the Lodden is a barn and shearing shed.

This mention of ‘lime’ refers to private lime kiln business Parker was evidently conducting on the side, mining and roasting lime from the limestone deposit within the Protectorate boundaries at what would later become Gilmore’s Spring, and which by the would become 1970s Coca Cola’s eponymous ‘Mount Franklin Spring’.

As he left the Protectorate in September 1847, Robinson cuttingly wrote:

Parker tells of what might have been and might be a school, why the mission as the Barwin (sic) has no school !!! Mr Parker all in prospect or else, the time is past [sic.] by, the government have lost the opportunity &c.

Robinson was in new offices in Melbourne in a room in John Batman’s old house at the junction of Spencer and Flinders Streets by June 1848. Soon after, on 11 August 1848, Robinson’s wife, Maria died after becoming chronically ill and in severe pain. George and Maria had grown apart during the Port Phillip years after frequent prolonged absences, and Robinson had also developed very strained relationships with his children.

By 19 Oct 1848, Robinson wrote that Parker had written to Governor La Trobe about ‘Hunter’s encroachments. Said he had approved of a fence for burying ground. Said Parker if he wanted a school should have employed his family. We had no business to keep his family’. Hunter was likely William Morrison Hunter, who had been on the Tarrrengower run on the Loddon River adjoining Newstead since 1842, previously run by Lauchlan Mackinnon 1839-41, and the encroachments referred to Hunter’s stock encroaching on the Loddon Protectorate boundaries. Some of these issues about the Protectorate boundaries and encroachment by Hunter are dealt with in C. C. Culvenor’s (1992) The boundaries of the Mount Franklin Aboriginal Reserve that includes excellent maps.

On 12 March 1849 Parker visited Robinson’s relocated office on Queen Street in Melbourne, having previously visited Governor La Trobe and convincing him to ‘have a schoolmaster &c.’ at Franklinford. Robinson noted in his dairy that day that Parker ‘is in a bad state of health.’

Closure of all Port Phillip Protectorates, December 1849

By 1849 the government authorities including Governor La Trobe were unable to ignore the abject failure of the Protectorate project, and an official investigation was ordered. A decade before a similar inquiry into Robinson’s work on Flinders Island had, in Vivienne Rae-Ellis’ (1988) Black Robinson book (p.226) judgement, exposed Robinson as ‘a failure, liar and cheat’. However as for the Van Diemen’s Land (VDL) inquiry, neither the personal roles of Robinson nor the Port Phillip Assistant Protectors roles were critically examined.

The Select Committee concluded that whilst the Protectorate system had failed totally, it was unable to recommend a substitute for it. In Parker’s prophetic words, the Aborigines had been ‘restrained but not reclaimed’. The Protectorate system in the Colony of Port Phillip was formally abolished in December 1849. Unfortunately Robinson’s candid personal diaries between 10 June 1849 (when he opened the official letter confirming the closure) and 31 Dec 1849 have not survived.

As an aside, in 1851 Robinson returned briefly to VDL and visited the 20 remaining VDL Aborigines at Oyster Cove south of Hobart, where they had been transferred from the Flinders Island’s similarly failed and deadly resettlement ‘experiment’. Within 20 years most were dead. With Truganina’s death in 1876.

Following abolition of the Protectorate in late 1849, Parker applied for and was granted a Pastoral License to the Protectorate Reserve under an arrangement with Governor La Trobe. Parker was allowed to depasture his own stock and cultivate sections of the land for his own use and that of the Aboriginal School, subject to him ‘giving employment, both pastoral and agricultural, as far as possible, to the Aboriginal natives.’

Joseph Parker sometime after Parker’s death (in Morrison, 1971, p.51) summarised his perception of the way his father managed to secure more than a golden handshake.

When the Aboriginal Station was abolished, Father was offered a licence for the reserve (sixty two square miles), which he accepted. We then moved our quarters to the foot of Mount Franklin, where we established our homestead, and commenced farming and grazing. We got on fairly well for about three years, but the discovery of gold on the Run brought a number of bad characters into the district and then our trouble began. 

Robinson next visited the Loddon station on a hot day in 27 Jan 1850 noting, ‘Parker at home. Is to remain at station Jem Crow to be called Mt Franklin and station Franklinham (sic.). Parker to run 8,000 sheep.’

The next day Robinson covered a lot of ground in his diary entry of 28 Jan 1850, reproduced in full to give some idea of what Robinson was seeing on the former Protectorate, as well as what he was most interested in and thinking about. Robinson wrote:

Hot day. At station, some natives there getting in wheat. Benevolent Society. Paddock is full of drakes. A black named [blank] died at the Loddon and the Loddon natives went and killed some Murry (sic.) natives in revenge and mustering at Simson’s [at Charlotte Plains, near Carisbrook] to fight it out, it is to be a grand affair the natives say.

The natives should be treated [as] men, they work as men and should be treated as men, a fair day’s wage for a fair day’s labor but this is never accorded them. It is thought if they get food it is enough for blacks.

The natives have a feeling that they are men and they evince that [they are] higher beings. The settlers all abuse them, men great scoundrels &c.

Loddon: Mrs Judkin [Mrs Margaret Judkins, with her husband Charles were teachers at the Aboriginal School with Parker] said her girls would not read before the men, what men I asked, oh sir, the native men they are all men and so it turned out and the four native females I saw one married woman and one elderly lubra had a child with her.

The run and compensation would be equivalent to 3000 [pound], ewes cost 4/1 licence run 10, difference for run 6/1. Look in the map of Ireland for unpronounceable names, so much for sarcasm. Wool left Loddon on Wednesday p.m. Buildings dilapidated. His Honor [Governor La Trobe] stopped three hours at the station.

The next day it rained, and Robinson wrote that in the afternoon ‘Capt. Hepburn returned from Melbourne, Called at station. Mrs H[epburn]. at Mr Budds for three months. John H. gone to VDL then to England to meet Sir J. Franklin’. On 30 January 1850 Robinson wrote: ‘Could not get the natives to attend school until the dogs was at work. Mrs Judkins [the school teacher] said girls travelled with them would only come when they choose.’

Robinson wrote down the names of 14 males and four females at Franklinford on that date in 1850, one of whom was recorded as ‘Eliza, Babine, Dicky’s lubra, one child with her’. Eliza, born around 1833 was a Daung Wurrung woman and would have been approximately 18 years old. The unnamed child was very likely Ellen, born in 1849, after whom ‘Ellen’s Walk for Reconciliation’ was named as part of the July 2018 NIADOC week celebrations. Ellen’s father ‘Dicky, Yerrebulluk’ was amongst the men listed, a Dja Dja Wurrung man likely then aged approximately 24 years. Robinson indicates in his diary that eight of the Aboriginal children at Franklinford were requested to read, five of whom ‘Attempted’, Three of whom ‘Read’.

Robinson completed the 30 January 1850 diary entry with ‘Bates said the total number of [blank] were 20’. Likely this refers to 20 Aboriginal people then at the station. William Bates had been employed at the station since January 1848, having previously worked as an overseer at the Goulburn Protectorate from Oct 1845.

The European rediscovery of gold in the Port Phillip District (that would certainly have been found in nugget form by Aboriginal Australians across goldfields Country for millennia) took place in Clunes in 1851 and at many other sites in the years and decades that followed. It is notable that during this time almost nothing was done officially by colonial governments to intervene on behalf of First Nations people during this second and much bigger invasion, until the ‘Mission and Central Station era’ policies and programs during the 1860s and 1870’s.